On 3/8/2016 7:39 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Wheatfield dear,
If memory serves (though chance of that happening these days is slim to
none) one of those golden oldies
once belonged to me. True or am I imagining?
Back left hand corner, if I am not mistaken.
ann
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, Bill wrot
Wheatfield dear,
If memory serves (though chance of that happening these days is slim to
none) one of those golden oldies
once belonged to me. True or am I imagining?
ann
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, Bill wrote:
On 3/6/2016 9:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
l
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016 06:25:10 -0600 Bill wrote:
>
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
>>
>>I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
>>great, but it is such a big lens.
>
>It is, but the new digital lenses are also huge. The 15-30 zoom weig
El 08/03/2016 a las 13:25, Bill escribió:
On 3/8/2016 4:51 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on f
On 3/8/2016 4:51 AM, Carlos R. wrote:
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
great,
El 08/03/2016 a las 3:48, Bill escribió:
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
I had one of those, used a lot on film cameras, less on digital. Works
great, but it is such a big lens.
Carlos
-
On 3/7/2016 8:42 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
Right you are, Mr. Alling.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
On 3/7/2016 7:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That's quite a collection of A lenses (really liked the A series; now all sold).
Not so much AF.
I never got into AF until I started buying lenses for digital, and then
everything was DA lenses for the small sensor. I completely skipped over
auto focus
That's the semi legendary A 15mm f3.5, based on it's cosmetics.
On 3/7/2016 8:48 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
That's quite a collection of A lenses (really liked the A series; now all sold).
Not so much AF.
What's the big one, 3d from the right in back?
Rick
On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Bill wrote:
Possibly this one
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/ultra-wide/K15f3.5-ii.html
On 8 March 2016 at 01:48, Rick Womer wrote:
> That's quite a collection of A lenses (really liked the A series; now all
> sold).
>
> Not so much AF.
>
> What's the big one, 3d from the right in back?
>
> Rick
>
>
That's quite a collection of A lenses (really liked the A series; now all sold).
Not so much AF.
What's the big one, 3d from the right in back?
Rick
On Mar 7, 2016, at 8:42 PM, Bill wrote:
> On 3/6/2016 9:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
>> lenses. ;-)
On 3/6/2016 9:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
lenses. ;-)
I've got a million of em.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and foll
Cute and relevant , Collin.
J
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 7, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Collin B wrote:
>>> On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>> That's obscene, Bill!
>>
>> Yeah, the processing is pretty bad.
>
> That comment reminded me of a classic strip
> https://xkcd.com/1014/
>
>
>
> --
>On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> That's obscene, Bill!
>>
>
>Yeah, the processing is pretty bad.
>
That comment reminded me of a classic strip
https://xkcd.com/1014/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Gives new meaning to "rummaging".
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Bill
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 4:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Peso: Glass Still Life
I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
many, many years. One thing
You know you need to get out more when you take a photo of your lenses!
:)
(Now you're making me miss the ones I sold)
Cheers,
Dave
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 3:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
> many, many years. One thing led to anot
No, I mean the luxury of an obscene number of
lenses. ;-)
J
- Original Message -
From: "Bill"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Sunday, March 6, 2016 7:25:03 PM
Subject: Re: Peso: Glass Still Life
On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> That's
On 3/6/2016 9:07 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
That's obscene, Bill!
Yeah, the processing is pretty bad.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
That's obscene, Bill!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 6:23 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
> many, many years. One thing led to another, and I emptied my camera bag, and
> took a few lenses out of the display case.
>
> S
I decided to dig out a few lenses that haven't seen the light of day for
many, many years. One thing led to another, and I emptied my camera bag,
and took a few lenses out of the display case.
So I lined em up, and shot em down, then I did some cringe worthy post
processing.
http://users.acc
20 matches
Mail list logo
