Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Dan. J Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: > > Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of > the "legs." > > Dan Matyola > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > >> On Tue, Sep 29,

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of the "legs." Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago. > >

Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago. Comments appreciated. Thanks! J http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Bob Sullivan
Jack, That Mamiya6 sure takes pretty pictures. Nice scan too. Regards, Bob S. On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > > > Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago. > > Comments appreciated. > > Thanks! > > J > >

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Ken Waller
I agree with Dan. Nicely done otherwise. -Original Message- >From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com >Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies > >Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of >the "legs." > >Da

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
In your case, I'm a bit surprised, Ken. Thanks for commenting. J - Original Message - From: "Ken Waller" <kwal...@peoplepc.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:18:51 AM Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilie

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Mark C
Elegant! Nice composition. Mark On 9/29/2015 7:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote: Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago. Comments appreciated. Thanks! J http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
Much appreciated, Mark C! J - Original Message - From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:48:48 AM Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies Elegant! Nice composition. Mark On 9/2

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread ann sanfedele
I disagree - I like the" legs" ... interesting composition - might tone down the saturation a bit? PRobably since you posted it a long time ago the translation to digital with 15 year old software is responsible - worth scanning again I think ann On 9/29/2015 9:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
nt: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:27:23 AM Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies I disagree - I like the" legs" ... interesting composition - might tone down the saturation a bit? PRobably since you posted it a long time ago the translation to digital with 15 year old software is responsible - wor

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
Pleasing remarks, Bob! Thanks! J - Original Message - From: "Bob Sullivan" <rf.sulli...@gmail.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:26:37 AM Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies Jack, That Mamiya6 sure take

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Knarf
Oo! Lovely! Cheers, frank On 29 September, 2015 7:44:53 AM EDT, Jack Davis wrote: > > >Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago. > >Comments appreciated. > >Thanks! > >J > >http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979 > > -- Sent

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
Thank yoou, Knarf! J - Original Message - From: "Knarf" <knarftheria...@gmail.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 8:04:59 PM Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies Oo! Lovely! Cheers, frank On 29 Sept

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Ken Waller
I'm suprised you're suprised, Jack. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@comcast.net> To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:42 AM Subject: Re: Peso- L

Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies

2015-09-29 Thread Jack Davis
essage - From: "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@comcast.net> > To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net> > Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:42 AM > Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies > > >> In your case, I'm a bit surprised, Ken. >> Thanks for com

PESO: Leggy Lilies

2006-08-02 Thread Jack Davis
Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to 'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make sense, even with the title? I realize that the lilies are a little blown out, but I'll leave it at that for now. (got it all ready to load. :) Thanks for opinions. Jack

Re: PESO: Leggy Lilies

2006-08-02 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 8/2/2006 7:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to 'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make sense, even with the title? I realize that the lilies are a little blown out, but I'll leave

Re: PESO: Leggy Lilies

2006-08-02 Thread Jack Davis
Thanks, Marnie. Appreciated, reassuring words. Jack --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 8/2/2006 7:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to 'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make

Re: PESO: Leggy Lilies

2006-08-02 Thread Bruce Dayton
A little work on the highlights would be good. The overall effect is good and the picture is a nice one. I don't think the title helps - I really don't associate the lower strands to the flowers, especially as legs. Nice shot, just call it Water Lilies. -- Best regards, Bruce Wednesday,

Re: PESO: Leggy Lilies

2006-08-02 Thread Jack Davis
Your're right, Bruce. My post tried to make an excuse for my not taking down some blossom highlights. The title may not help, but it's my way of expressing my feeling about the shot. :) Thanks, Jack --- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A little work on the highlights would be good. The