Thanks, Dan.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 29, 2015, at 6:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of
> the "legs."
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 29,
Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of
the "legs."
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 7:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago.
>
>
Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago.
Comments appreciated.
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Jack,
That Mamiya6 sure takes pretty pictures.
Nice scan too.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago.
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
>
I agree with Dan. Nicely done otherwise.
-Original Message-
>From: "Daniel J. Matyola" <danmaty...@gmail.com
>Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
>
>Despite the caption, I think the image would be stronger with less of
>the "legs."
>
>Da
In your case, I'm a bit surprised, Ken.
Thanks for commenting.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller" <kwal...@peoplepc.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:18:51 AM
Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilie
Elegant! Nice composition.
Mark
On 9/29/2015 7:44 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago.
Comments appreciated.
Thanks!
J
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast
Much appreciated, Mark C!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Mark C" <pdml-m...@charter.net>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:48:48 AM
Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
Elegant! Nice composition.
Mark
On 9/2
I disagree - I like the" legs" ... interesting composition - might tone
down the saturation a bit?
PRobably since you posted it a long time ago the translation to digital
with 15 year old software is
responsible - worth scanning again I think
ann
On 9/29/2015 9:06 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
nt: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:27:23 AM
Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
I disagree - I like the" legs" ... interesting composition - might tone
down the saturation a bit?
PRobably since you posted it a long time ago the translation to digital
with 15 year old software is
responsible - wor
Pleasing remarks, Bob!
Thanks!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan" <rf.sulli...@gmail.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 7:26:37 AM
Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
Jack,
That Mamiya6 sure take
Oo! Lovely!
Cheers,
frank
On 29 September, 2015 7:44:53 AM EDT, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
>Cropped from a Mamiya6 image shot and maybe posted 15 years ago.
>
>Comments appreciated.
>
>Thanks!
>
>J
>
>http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=979
>
>
--
Sent
Thank yoou, Knarf!
J
- Original Message -
From: "Knarf" <knarftheria...@gmail.com>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 8:04:59 PM
Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
Oo! Lovely!
Cheers,
frank
On 29 Sept
I'm suprised you're suprised, Jack.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@comcast.net>
To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: Peso- L
essage - From: "Jack Davis" <jdavi...@comcast.net>
> To: "PDML" <pdml@pdml.net>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 10:42 AM
> Subject: Re: Peso- Leggy Lilies
>
>
>> In your case, I'm a bit surprised, Ken.
>> Thanks for com
Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to
'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make sense, even with the
title?
I realize that the lilies are a little blown out, but I'll leave it at
that for now. (got it all ready to load. :)
Thanks for opinions.
Jack
In a message dated 8/2/2006 7:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to
'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make sense, even with the
title?
I realize that the lilies are a little blown out, but I'll leave
Thanks, Marnie. Appreciated, reassuring words.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/2/2006 7:13:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Am curious as to your reaction to this. Does it need the title to
'explain' why I cropped it this way? Does it make
A little work on the highlights would be good. The overall effect is
good and the picture is a nice one. I don't think the title helps - I
really don't associate the lower strands to the flowers, especially as
legs. Nice shot, just call it Water Lilies.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday,
Your're right, Bruce. My post tried to make an excuse for my not taking
down some blossom highlights.
The title may not help, but it's my way of expressing my feeling about
the shot. :)
Thanks,
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A little work on the highlights would be good. The
20 matches
Mail list logo