Re: Peso Tree and Stones II

2008-01-16 Thread David J Brooks
Thank you Rick. Once in a while i get one right. LOL Dave On Jan 15, 2008 9:49 PM, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This shot is excellent! The snow, the stone, the trees, the framing, the exposure and conversion--all just spot-on. Rick --- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Peso Tree and Stones II

2008-01-15 Thread David J Brooks
Another from the cemetery shoot yesterday. Same thing, i'm trying for trees in winter shots, but maybe the stones detract from that. http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6840957 K10D, 16-45, LR conversion, CS1 clone dust and minor crop Dave -- Equine Photography www.caughtinmotion.com

Re: Peso Tree and Stones II

2008-01-15 Thread Bruce Dayton
Well, if you are trying for trees, then they need to be the subject. This one, like the previous one, is about the headstone. Not that this is a bad shot, just that the trees are more of a framing element rather than the subject. -- Best regards, Bruce Tuesday, January 15, 2008, 5:21:46 AM,

Re: Peso Tree and Stones II

2008-01-15 Thread David J Brooks
On Jan 15, 2008 12:14 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, if you are trying for trees, then they need to be the subject. This one, like the previous one, is about the headstone. Not that this is a bad shot, just that the trees are more of a framing element rather than the subject.

Re: Peso Tree and Stones II

2008-01-15 Thread Rick Womer
This shot is excellent! The snow, the stone, the trees, the framing, the exposure and conversion--all just spot-on. Rick --- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another from the cemetery shoot yesterday. Same thing, i'm trying for trees in winter shots, but maybe the stones detract