--- Original Message ---
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
Sent: December 30, 2011 12/30/11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Fwd: Photos of Children
Begin forwarded message:
From: Google+ Discuss on behalf of sausagefeatures
google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
and pornographers. Hell I would guess I take as many photos of
children without the permission of their parents as anyone on this list.
I guess that being the naive guy that I am I could not understand this parent
getting upset enough to contact Google if this was all innocent.
I should have known better
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Fwd: Photos of Children
I either missed the original message or am getting the list back to
front today. Both occasionally occurs with the digests.
There's A LOT of context missing here, but whoever took the photos
apparently is close enough to the original Google
Begin forwarded message:
From: Google+ Discuss on behalf of sausagefeatures
google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Date: December 30, 2011 5:29:15 AM EST
To: google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Subject: Photos of Children
Reply-To: Google+ Discuss on behalf of sausagefeatures
--- Original Message ---
From: Eric Weir eew...@bellsouth.net
Sent: December 30, 2011 12/30/11
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Fwd: Photos of Children
Begin forwarded message:
From: Google+ Discuss on behalf of sausagefeatures
google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Date
On 12/30/2011 11:02 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Google+ Discuss on behalf of
sausagefeaturesgoogle-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Date: December 30, 2011 5:29:15 AM EST
To: google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Subject: Photos of Children
Reply-To: Google
-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Date: December 30, 2011 5:29:15 AM EST
To: google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
Subject: Photos of Children
Reply-To: Google+ Discuss on behalf of sausagefeatures
google-plus-disc...@googleproductforums.com
I have been invited to view an album
Some people get a special kind of psycho. Period.
After one of the public dance events, my wife posted the photos of
the people she took to facebook. As a part of the event, there was
a dress-up, semi-formal sit-down dinner.
Some guy (unknown before and after) contacted her asking to remove a
I don't think it is psycho of a parent to ask that photos of his or her
children be taken down from a website - if they are reconizeable as
individuals, certainly. had I been the photograpehr I would have
respected the parents wishes as I would anyone whose photo I took
who disliked it... at
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 01:42:27PM -0500, David Parsons wrote:
People get a special kind of psycho when it's their own spawn. You
really can't reason with them, even when the law is on your side.
Oh, it doesn't have top be their own spawn. There's knee-jerk reaction
to the combination of
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 3:58 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
Absent evidence to the contrary, I'd just assume that said photographs were
taken at some public event, quite possibly by somebody known to the family.
Were the kids showing off, dressed up in costumes, participating in an
As a matter of policy, we don't publish identifiable pictures of our
children, or their names. They're not hidden very deep, someone
aggressive and knowledgeable with search engines could dig it out.
Partly because I'm a semi-public figure and reasonably paranoid.
Partly because we believe
This reminds me of a story I saw recently about the early days of HIV/AIDS -
some kid in Virginia was required to wear a bubble to school to protect the
other kids. Today it is photographers who are dangerous and many want to put a
bubble around us to protect themselves and their kids.
I think
I agree with many of you that the concern about the kiddy porn stuff is
a bit over the top...
My point is that anyone whose photo has been taken should be asked if
they mind being published if it is possible to do so and certainly if
you take a photo straight on. And if you can get a models
Begin forwarded message:
That's kind of creepy.
Not seeing the photos, I don't know if the photographer had the right to take
them. If the kids were in a public place, a place where there is no
reasonable expectation of privacy, then there's nothing legally wrong with
doing so.
On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:58 PM, John Francis wrote:
We don't have any information about what the photographs in question are,
where they were taken, or anything of the kind. And yet there are posts
here all too ready to assume that these are kiddy porn galleries, and
that the photographer must
Ann,
Several years ago, I brought an album with photos taken at a music festival
to the next one, so that people can see the photos.
Several people said: Great album, all wonderful photos, except for my
photograph, could you please remove it?
A similar situation repeated the next time...
If I
On 12/30/2011 17:59, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Ironically, recently, I had a dancer who stopped in the middle of a
social dance (tango), walked to me across the floor (to the edge of
the dance floor), and asked not to take any more pictures of her.
(This happened after I had taken a few within
Fri Dec 30 21:16:07 EST 2011
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So, when I get to photograph other children, I often ask the parents
if they mind that.
But then sometimes it's just not practical, say as in this case:
http://42graphy.org/tango/denvermem-2010/_IR_8543.html
Well in this case (above)
and pornographers. Hell I would guess I take as many photos of
children without the permission of their parents as anyone on this list.
I guess that being the naive guy that I am I could not understand this parent
getting upset enough to contact Google if this was all innocent.
I should have
20 matches
Mail list logo
