TECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: Picture Window Pro v Photoshop
> There are some user friendly cuddly front ends that address the raw
numbers
> issues (however I've venture to say that they'd likely not be as accurate
as
> the long hand method). Where
On 7 Jan 2004 at 19:02, Herb Chong wrote:
> they can be, but i object having to calculate polynomial coefficients on my
> pocket calculator to do something that the plugin should let me do
> interactively. that's why i won't use Panotools even though it is the best out
> there. i don't have the ti
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: Picture Window Pro v Photoshop
> On 3 Jan 2004 at 18:29, Herb Chong wrote:
>
> > the lens distortion, noise, and c
This is a good site, but the biggest problem was that the site assumes
everyone is working with a monitor set for 1024 x 768.
I need the larger text, so I use a setting of 832 x 624. Most sites
accommodate that. Some don't.
With this one, I have to move the screen from side to side to
accommodate h
Popped right up on my browser.
--
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Sheesh, that site is s-l-o-w ...
Rob Studdert wrote:
The Panotools plug-in can be used to correct chromatic aberrations:
http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/TutorialsDistortionAndColorFringing.html
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.co
Sheesh, that site is s-l-o-w ...
Rob Studdert wrote:
> The Panotools plug-in can be used to correct chromatic aberrations:
>
> http://www.caldwellphotographic.com/TutorialsDistortionAndColorFringing.html
On 3 Jan 2004 at 18:29, Herb Chong wrote:
> the lens distortion, noise, and chromatic abberation corrections in PW Pro
> are much harder to achieve in Photoshop. i haven't seen any plugins for
> chromatic abberation yet, although i have seen ones for noise and lens
> distortion.
The Panotools plu
Earlier Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote that he had
downloaded PWPro 3.1.
Shel -
PWPro 3.5 added quite a few features. The advanced sharpening was a big
one. There were also a lot of improvements to the "browser" that let you
compose album pages. I think the "sticky settings" optio
Ahh ... I see the that you're talking about PWP 3.5, and I DL'd v3.1 I'm getting 3.5
now. That has the advanced sharpening setup maybe a different curves adjustment
as
well. Thanks again!
shel
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hi George ...
>
> Great info ... no need to apologize about the length
Hi George ...
Great info ... no need to apologize about the length of the message. I was
disappointed it ended when it did
The downloaded file was for PWPro 3.1 ... it has the chromatic aberration feature,
which is rather nice. Will have to try it on my editing machine with some other
photos,
Earlier Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked for comments on
Picture Window Pro vs. Photoshop 7.0
Shel - I've been using Photoshop and Picture Window Pro for a while
now. Both have their pros and cons, but I'm going to make my comments from
the viewpoint of a Photoshop user wondering about
>
> To: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 6:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Picture Window Pro v Photoshop
>
> > If you already own Photoshop, I really doubt there is anything in PW
> > Pro that would make you want to switch. If, like
Hi Bruce ...
Well, I've got PS 7.0, and really like it, but sometimes I don't want to load
"the big gun" for some little editing job, and IrfanView, while nice, lacks a
lot of features. From what I can see having fiddled with the PWPro program
just a little, it might be a nice middle ground betwe
n" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: Picture Window Pro v Photoshop
> If you already own Photoshop, I really doubt there is anything in PW
> Pro that would make you want to swit
I've used it quite a bit. Overall I like it. One of the big
comparisons between it and photoshop is the price. Remember that full
price photoshop is $600+. Quite steep for my blood. PW Pro is $90.
On the plus side, it is one of the few programs that fully support
color management. It is also
Hi gang,
It was suggested I try PW Pro. Right now I'm using PS 7.0 and
IrfanView. Anyone using PWPro care to comment on the capabilities of
the software, maybe how it compares to Photoshop?
I've DL'd the trial version of PWPro, yet it would be nice to get some
feedback from those who've used it
16 matches
Mail list logo
