when most other cameras are kept in the bag.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: "Raimo K"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: 19/12/04 08:23:54
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
Optio S4i is even better: small
ROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
I'd recommend the Ricoh GR-1. Excellent 28mm f/2.8 lens, program and
aperture priority modes, exposure compensation, and decent metal build in
a very compact body.
Nick
-Or
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that necrophilia?)
Peter
>
>You didn't say if you were thinking about film or digital.
>My pocket camera is an Optio 550. I'd recommend it.
>
>ERNR
Saturday, December 18, 2004, 6:45:32 AM, Michel wrote:
MCG> Peter Smekal a écrit :
>>Is that comparable to the Yashica T4super/t5?
>>Peter
>>
>>
MCG> I don't know the Yashica, but the Espio Mini is small as the Olympus "
MCG> *µ *" , and i's Pentax.
And is just a normal (albeit small) P&S. The
Peter Smekal a Ãcrit :
Is that comparable to the Yashica T4super/t5?
Peter
I don't know the Yashica, but the Espio Mini is small as the Olympus "
*Î *" , and i's Pentax.
It's quite a bit smaller than the standard Leica, perhaps closer to the CL
in size. The lens is quite good. It's a fine little camera, but one may
need a large shirt pocket for it. It fits in some of my shirts and
certainly in most all of my jacket pockets.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From:
Friday, December 17, 2004, 6:54:48 PM, Peter wrote:
PS> Thanks Frantisek,
PS> would you consider the Ricoh and the Canonet as "pocket cameras"?
PS> Peter
The Ricoh - definitely. It's _the_ slimmest 35mm film camera ever. And
it's made mostly of magnesium. I have no long track record with it,
tho
Thanks Frantisek,
would you consider the Ricoh and the Canonet as "pocket cameras"?
Peter
>
>Better would be Ricoh GR1v - even better lens, aperture priority,
>faster, and what's best, normal ergonomic controls - switches for
>everything. Like aperture, flash use, all are controlled by hard
>switc
Is that comparable to the Yashica T4super/t5?
Peter
>Pentax:
>Espio Mini , or UC-1
>http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/collection/espiomini.htm
>
>Michel
Pentax:
Espio Mini , or UC-1
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/krg/collection/espiomini.htm
Michel
In a message dated 12/17/04 11:37:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>f I was getting one it would be an Optio. That's a real pocket camera.
>
>
>
>
>Cheers,
> Cotty
That's a shirt pocket camera..
Vic
On 16/12/04, Peter Smekal, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I am thinking about a small (pocket) camera as a christmas present. Any
>recommendations? It doesn't necessarily have to be a Pentax though. Built
>and optical quality is more important.
If I was getting one it would be an O
Thursday, December 16, 2004, 2:27:31 PM, Peter wrote:
PS> Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that necrophilia?)
Hi Peter,
Olympus Mju 2 (stylus epic) is pretty good as cheap P&S go. For more
use, it has two problems - shutter lag is very long (the lens focuses
AFTER you fullpress the shutt
y for the
> buck.
> Regards
>
> Albano
>
>
>> > fra: Peter Smekal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >
>> > Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that
>> necrophilia?)
>> >
>> > Peter
>> > >
>> > >You didn'
Only if you do things with it that we shudder to speak of on this list...
(Wait a minute may that _should_ be shutter).
Peter Smekal wrote:
Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that necrophilia?)
Peter
You didn't say if you were thinking about film or digital.
My pocket camera is an
On Thursday 16 December 2004 08:38, Don Sanderson wrote:
> I didn't see your original post but for film it's hard
> to go wrong with an Olympus Stylus Epic.
> Tiny, light and has a top quality, razor sharp lens.
> Also comes in zoom models but the lenses aren't as good,
> or as fast.
>
> Don
Gotta
;
> > >You didn't say if you were thinking about film or
> digital.
> > >My pocket camera is an Optio 550. I'd recommend
> it.
> > >
> > >ERNR
> >
> >
> >
> >
&
I use a Contax T3 and recommend it with all my heart!!!
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 9:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
Try Ricoh GR1s (or GR1v). Beatiful little camera with a great
What Keith said... an impressive LITTLE package!
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Dec 16, 2004 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
Hi Peter...
I'm very impressed with my Pentax Optio S4!
I bought it st
I have been very pleased with my Optio S. And, It's a Pentax!
Peter Smekal wrote:
Hi all,
I am thinking about a small (pocket) camera as a christmas present. Any
recommendations? It doesn't necessarily have to be a Pentax though. Built
and optical quality is more important.
Peter, Sweden
the 123 Lithium battery,
it lasts forever and works well in the cold.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Smekal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:47 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Pocket camera?
>
>
> Don, is that
ia?)
>
> Peter
> >
> >You didn't say if you were thinking about film or digital.
> >My pocket camera is an Optio 550. I'd recommend it.
> >
> >ERNR
>
>
>
>
I have one in each car.
In mine is an Olympus XA2. Cheap. $10 or less. 2 A76 batts.
In the wife's is a particular Canon p&s. I don't remember the model, but no
zoom, has ir remote, and even (of all things to put on a p&s) a waist-level
finder! Decently sharp pics.
Recommendation -- Oly Sty
nses aren't as good,
>or as fast.
>
>Don
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Peter Smekal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:28 AM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
>>
>>
>> Primarily
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Pocket camera?
>
>
> Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that necrophilia?)
>
> Peter
> >
> >You didn't say if you were thinking about film or
Primarily I was thinking about film. (Is that necrophilia?)
Peter
>
>You didn't say if you were thinking about film or digital.
>My pocket camera is an Optio 550. I'd recommend it.
>
>ERNR
Quoting Peter Smekal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all,
> I am thinking about a small (pocket) camera as a christmas present. Any
> recommendations? It doesn't necessarily have to be a Pentax though. Built
> and optical quality is more important.
> Peter, Sweden
You didn&
s an exceptional job, compared to almost any 4 MP camera I
can think of!
keith whaley
Peter Smekal wrote:
Hi all,
I am thinking about a small (pocket) camera as a christmas present. Any
recommendations? It doesn't necessarily have to be a Pentax though. Built
and optical quality is more important.
Peter, Sweden
Hi all,
I am thinking about a small (pocket) camera as a christmas present. Any
recommendations? It doesn't necessarily have to be a Pentax though. Built
and optical quality is more important.
Peter, Sweden
Whoever it was wanting a lightweight
carry-around, I picked up an Olympus
XA2/A11 combo today. The camera is
nice, but the flash is imperfect.
Fresh batteries included. $45 +
shipping to where-ever.
Collin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <
30 matches
Mail list logo
