Re: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Mike Johnston
> No what it proves is that I can claim moral superiority with the best of them. > > To stand on a hill and claim I'm morally superior and therefor my facts are > unassailable is not an argument. > > To ascribe the worst motives to others and make your case with 'secret' > knowledge > is dishones

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Peter Alling
No what it proves is that I can claim moral superiority with the best of them. To stand on a hill and claim I'm morally superior and therefor my facts are unassailable is not an argument. To ascribe the worst motives to others and make your case with 'secret' knowledge is dishonest. If someone

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Mike Johnston
> You know it's been a very long time since I had to read this so I'm not > sure of the authorship. I think it was either TS Eliot or George Orwell, who > wrote an essay during WWII, using impeccable logic to prove that English > pacifists supported Adolf Hitler and all he stood for. And this prov

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Mike Johnston
> In my opinion Mr. Johnson is being a useful > idiot, not > my words but those of Mao, (and Lenin before him). It is one thing to > support peace > but do any of the protesters actually _think_ of what their support for > peace implies, > obviously not. Oh, screw you, Peter. You don't know ANYT

RE: Vs: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Amita Guha
I'll say it again, guys. Come on over to the wwwac-politics list. You can discuss anything you want ad nauseum over there. http://email.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=politics Amita

Vs: Vs: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Raimo Korhonen
3 14:27 Aihe: Re: Vs: Vs: Political commentary >Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography >arguments someplace else... Thanks. > >Fred >

Re: OT: Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography arguments someplace else... Thanks. Fred

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography arguments someplace else... Thanks. Fred

Re: Vs: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-02 Thread Fred
Would you guys ~please~ take your non-Pentax, non-photography arguments someplace else... Thanks. Fred

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Kevin Waterson
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Raimo, > Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He I really dont give a toss about this thread, but just a small correction. Iraq invaded Kuwait to stop the 'slant drilling' across the border into Iraqi oil f

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Paul Stenquist
al Message - > From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 6:28 PM > Subject: Re: Vs: Political commentary > > > It's interesting. We've now had at least two dozen posts in regard to &g

Vs: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Raimo Korhonen
all. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 01. helmikuuta 2003 22:17 Aihe: Re: Vs: Politica

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Feroze Kistan
urday, February 01, 2003 6:28 PM Subject: Re: Vs: Political commentary > It's interesting. We've now had at least two dozen posts in regard to > the Iraq situation, but not a single comment on the PUG. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Raimo, > > Where is y

Putting some Pentax in it (veering off from Re: Political commentary)

2003-02-01 Thread Jostein
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:02 PM Subject: Vs: Political commentary > Correct. > But what is happening now in the USA? GWB´s statements are alarmingly similar to what Hitler said against Poland in 1939. > All the best! > Raimo > Personal photograph

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Feroze Kistan
ject: Re: Vs: Political commentary > Raimo, > Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He > sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. He conducted a 10 year (?) war > with Iran. If he was your neighbor, you would be looking for a cave to hide > i

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Paul Stenquist
It's interesting. We've now had at least two dozen posts in regard to the Iraq situation, but not a single comment on the PUG. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Raimo, > Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He > sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. He condu

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Feroze Kistan
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 11:16 PM Subject: Re: Vs: Political commentary > Raimo, > Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He > sent Skud missiles at I

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Rfsindg
Raimo, Where is your brain? My God, the man invaded Kuwait to steal the oil. He sent Skud missiles at Israel and the Saudi's. He conducted a 10 year (?) war with Iran. If he was your neighbor, you would be looking for a cave to hide in. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > But what

Re: Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Paul Stenquist
PROTECTED]> > Päivä: 01. helmikuuta 2003 21:39 > Aihe: Re: Political commentary > > This is getting a little stupid. If it wasn't for America, you'd all be > wearing swastikas. And if the Allied powers had held Hitler to the > League of Nations disarmnament agreement in t

Vs: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Raimo Korhonen
TED]> Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Päivä: 01. helmikuuta 2003 21:39 Aihe: Re: Political commentary This is getting a little stupid. If it wasn't for America, you'd all be wearing swastikas. And if the Allied powers had held Hitler to the League of Nations

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Paul Stenquist
essage - > From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:21 PM > Subject: Re: Political commentary > > > Well, it's your choice. > > > > I have a young son in the army wh

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Feroze Kistan
ob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:21 PM Subject: Re: Political commentary > Well, it's your choice. > > I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't > see another Hanoi

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread T Rittenhouse
ED]> Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 2:21 PM Subject: Re: Political commentary > Well, it's your choice. > > I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't > see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike) or some similar thing rise out of > t

Re: Political commentary

2003-02-01 Thread Bob Blakely
Well, it's your choice. I have a young son in the army who's already shipped out. I hope we don't see another Hanoi Jane (or Baghdad Mike) or some similar thing rise out of this bullshit to the peril of my son or others due to such idiocy. I watched fools like you help to cause the death of my fel

Re: Political commentary

2003-01-31 Thread Peter Alling
Stands less than a snowballs chance in Hell no matter what your politics, be realistic. At 03:59 PM 1/31/2003 -0600, you wrote: This might be of interest to our American friends. http://www.votetoimpeach.org/ I pass it on with no comment. William Robb Outside of a dog, a book is man's best fri

Political commentary

2003-01-31 Thread William Robb
This might be of interest to our American friends. http://www.votetoimpeach.org/ I pass it on with no comment. William Robb