There was a copy of what was supposed top be the 1.1 firmware on  
http://www.pentaxiste.org/article.php3?id_article=36

The web page has now been amended because they were actually supplied with 1.0 
firmware, and are still waiting for 1.1.

However, someone tried it out here: 
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1028&message=6420842

"Knowing that I can always select "No" if I don't feel safe to, I downloaded the file 
from the French site, copied the firmware .bin file to the root directory of the CF 
card. Turning on the camera while holding down the Menu button, the *ist D boots up 
into the firmware update screen. However, the confirmation screen shows something like 
this: 

Current version : 1.00 
Update version: 1.00 

Obviously I chose "No" at this point. :)"

At least this demonstrates that we should be able to do it, and that it is likely 
Pentax will make the updates available for us when they are available.


The guy who posted this is a lurker here, and has sent me a copy which seems useful to 
keep as a backup in case some problem comes out of the real 1.1 upgrade - so that I 
can go back to 1.0.  (Thanks Peter)  If anyone else wants a copy, give me a shout.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michel Carrère-Gée [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 21 October 2003 15:58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *ist D new firmware 1.1 (Confusion !!)
> 
> 
> Michel Carrère-Gée a écrit:
> > A French page (from my friend Clover): 
> > http://www.pentaxiste.org/article.php3?id_article=36
> > I don't know the original source.
> > 
> > Michel
> > 
> Attention!
> Had confusion there, the firmaware is not a rev 1.1, but well 
> a rev 1.00. Therefore the *istD don't require up to date 
> appropriate for the meantime! The source of the firmware is a 
> official source Pentax, but had mistake 
> there at the time of information on the release!
> 
> Distress of the false joy!
> 
> On the other hand, what remains positive, it is to know that 
> firmwares 
> are put up to date as easily.
> 
> Sorry, Michel
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to