Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

Frantisek wrote on 16.03.05 12:20: > I meant I laughed at the constant quarrels between people there on DPREVIEW... Oh yes, that's true. Neverending, pointless quarrels. Just like a small children, who often like to quarrel with friends who has the best toy :-) > If the price you mention is near

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

>> share Rob's scepticism. Although, I am not a sceptic. I just laughed >> at all the threads on dpreview about D2X vs 1DSII. SP> Both are great cameras. I wish Pentax could produce *istD succesor with SP> 12MPix sensor as used in D2X. And AF performance at level of D2X would be SP> nice too ;-) I

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

Frantisek wrote on 16.03.05 0:52: > I wonder about the "extra large sensor" and only 18.6 MP. It could > mean the noise would be well controled, perhaps quite better than the > 22MP backs so far. Let's hope it will be better than Kodak's CMOS sensor used in DCS-14x models. It wasn't too good noise

RE: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

se - that it's facing the same desteny as the MZ-D! Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 16. marts 2005 00:57 Til: pentax list Emne: Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement On 16/3/05, Frantis

RE: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

As some of you may recall, I'm not at all surprised! This was expected. Pentax must support it's MF costumers/camera-/lens- and accessories line-up. The surprising part is that they haven't done this a long time ago - like Rollei, Mamiya, Hasselblad. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

the real question is: where is paal? mishka On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:57:08 +, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 16/3/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >where is the flurry of activity? 1000 messages telling "it won't sell" > >"it will sell" et cetera? Speculations? > > You'r

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

On 16/3/05, Frantisek, discombobulated, unleashed: >where is the flurry of activity? 1000 messages telling "it won't sell" >"it will sell" et cetera? Speculations? You're looking in the wrong thread Fra Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

Woo! Hoo! And it means Pal was right all along ;-) where is the flurry of activity? 1000 messages telling "it won't sell" "it will sell" et cetera? Speculations? I wonder about the "extra large sensor" and only 18.6 MP. It could mean the noise would be well controled, perhaps quite better than th

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

Don't ruin the moment by thinking about price! Let's hope the chipset features don't let the sensor down. On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 18:25:15 -0500, Steve Desjardins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, that answers that question. I'm assuming the sensor size is > greater than 24 x 36 mm or they could

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

On 15/3/05, Larry Hodgson, discombobulated, unleashed: >Per The Luminous-Landscape.com, Pentax has just announced an 18.6 Megapixel >645 Digital Camera ! > >Larry in Prescott > > >http://www.luminous-landscape.com/new/index.shtml Well spotted Larry. Also here:

Re: 18.6 MP 645 announcement

Well, that answers that question. I'm assuming the sensor size is greater than 24 x 36 mm or they could have just used their 35 lenses. The bigger sensor should mean good noise characteristics. I wonder what the price on that puppy is gonna be. Steven Desjardins Department of Chemistry Washing