h end, respectively, of the
allowable QC tolerance.
At this point, speaking technically, all I can
say is: The FA24-90 rocks!! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 2:40 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject:
I use the DA 50-200, and it's earned me quite a few dollars. It may not
be the sharpest tool in the shed wide open, but it has great flare
resistance, and it's fabulous at f8 or so. But it's greatest virtues
may well be its compact size and it's focusing clutch that allows
manual correction.
P
As if I really needed a reason to not get the DA50-200mm.
I've never done an actual test but the FA28-200mm is more than
adequate on a *ist-D, (it doesn't always show since I often take
shots in marginal conditions).
Don Sanderson wrote:
Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
against each ot
Don Sanderson wrote:
Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768 screen size.
Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
It's not surprising to me... So, what's the surprise? I was very
un-impressed with the 28-70/4 I had and I just
Thanks Godfrey, I was just being lazy. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 1:13 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Re: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
>
> Don,
>
> If you use a table, the p
s written for a 1024x768 screen size.
Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 11:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subjec
Consider it hung on to! ;-)
It and the 16-45 are currently my favorite zooms.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Jack Davis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 12:25 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
>
size.
> Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
> And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, December 25, 2005 11:44 AM
> >
Thnaks.
No need to be sorry.:-)
Dave
> Hi Dave, sorry, it was written for a 1024x768
screen size.
> Order on screen is DA50-200, FA28-70/4, FA24-90/3.5-4.5.
> And yes, the 24-90 is better by quite a bit.
>
> Don
>
4 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
>
> Don.
>
> I see two targets on the top of my screen and one at the bottom left.
> Are they in order of the lenses you mention below.
>
> If so, the 24-90(b
Don.
I see two targets on the top of my screen and one at the bottom left.
Are they in order of the lenses you mention below.
If so, the 24-90(bottom) looks the best to me.
Dave
> > Don Sanderson wrote:
> > > Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
>
Wow. Looks like I should get a 24-90 and dunk it in water briefly...
:)
j
On 12/24/05, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
> against each other.
> FA28-70, DA50-200 and FA24-90.
> The 24-90 is from a wonderful list member
> who got it replaced aft
I'd like to see that too.
So far I'm very impressed with the 24-90,
that short end is great on the digital.
don
> -Original Message-
> From: David Oswald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 8:35 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>
Don Sanderson wrote:
Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
against each other.
FA28-70, DA50-200 and FA24-90.
The 24-90 is from a wonderful list member
who got it replaced after a brief dunk in
water. 6 hours later I had it cleaned and
on the D and _I Love It!_
Dear wonderful list member, (yo
, December 24, 2005 6:25 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
What focus method did you use? Are they off a tripod? Remote shutter
release?
Interesting, but I'd like to know more about the methodology.
Paul
On Dec 24, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
.
Both the FA's focus much closer than this so
were well within their "comfort zone".
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 6:25 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: 3 quick l
What focus method did you use? Are they off a tripod? Remote shutter
release?
Interesting, but I'd like to know more about the methodology.
Paul
On Dec 24, 2005, at 6:56 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
against each other.
FA28-70, DA50-200 and FA24-90.
The 24-
Try again and it will *magically* appear! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 6:07 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
>
> 24~90? I don&#x
24~90? I don't see that test care to try again LOL>
Shel
" ... "
> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: PDML
> Date: 12/24/2005 3:58:09 PM
> Subject: 3 quick lens tests_Surprise.
>
> Here are three of my "best" lenses pitted
> against each othe
19 matches
Mail list logo
