Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-22 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 21/03/02 22:22:02 GMT Standard Time, Cotty writes: I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) Mike. Someone does, now. Pray tell, whoever you are. Hope it's coming to the PDML meet... I don't think he's

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-22 Thread mike wilson
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would have thought that at the rate we buy kit, it was in your interest to point ANY cutomers in this direction! I don't think he has internet, at all. You mean he spends his spare time _taking pictures_? Pervert. m - This message is from the

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-22 Thread Cotty
I would have thought that at the rate we buy kit, it was in your interest to point ANY cutomers in this direction! I don't think he has internet, at all. You mean he spends his spare time _taking pictures_? Pervert. God that is so sick. These people shouldn't be allowed to buy

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Cotty
I went for a stroll the other Sunday, to a local lake on my landlord's farm. I took only my LX and drive with 300 Tokina 2.8 to give it a try. I recently asked about heavy duty quick release systems because I wanted to keep to the same system across all my monopod and tripod-mounted lenses,

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread mike wilson
Hi, Cotty wrote: So, what I did was simply remove the quick release head from the monopod, and mount the 300 2.8 straight onto the head mounting bush. I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) and found it extremely acceptable. It's alright

RE: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Alan Abbott
Can't afford it ! Alan -Original Message- From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 11:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: A few quick release questions Hi, Cotty wrote: So, what I did was simply remove the quick release head from

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 21/03/02 11:44:51 GMT Standard Time, Cotty writes: I decided I like to pop the combo onto my shoulder, camera/lens facing backwards, with the monopod leg down my chest where I can steady it with a hand. I found that this works very well, and my only worry was the whole

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 21/03/02 11:44:51 GMT Standard Time, Mike writes: I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) Mike. Someone does, now. Kind regards peter - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread mike wilson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't even remind me. A Tamron 300mm f2.8 sheared off the bush from a Gitzo monopod this way, entailing cracked front element, totally buggered hood, cracked motordrive, and a few minor scuffs to the camera. Once in a lifetime is once too often for me. Er, gulp!

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread mike wilson
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 21/03/02 11:44:51 GMT Standard Time, Mike writes: I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) Mike. Someone does, now. Pray tell, whoever you are. Hope it's coming to the PDML meet... m

RE: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Without a pivoting head of some sort, you can't shoot verticals. Moreover, the recommemded stance for holding a monopd is to brace it toward you at an angle. In effect, it and your two legs become a tripod. A head lets you tilt the monopod in this way and still shoot sraight ahead. Rob

RE: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Rob Brigham
verticals anyway. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 21 March 2002 15:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: A few quick release questions Without a pivoting head of some sort, you can't shoot verticals. Moreover, the recommemded stance

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Camdir
In a message dated 21/03/02 14:34:45 GMT Standard Time, Mike writes: In a message dated 21/03/02 11:44:51 GMT Standard Time, Mike writes: I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) Mike. Someone does, now. Pray tell, whoever you

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread T Rittenhouse
: A few quick release questions At 06:43 21-3-2002 -0500, you wrote: So, what I did was simply remove the quick release head from the monopod, and mount the 300 2.8 straight onto the head mounting bush. Actual shooting isn't a problem, it's the carrying. I decided I like to pop the combo onto

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Mark Roberts
Wendy Beard wrote: When I bought my monopod in the local shop I also asked for advice on heads for it. I'd taken the camera along too to try it out. The salesman told me that, in his opinion, I didn't need one and should just screw the pod straight onto the camera. Sent me off to go and try

RE: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Cotty
Without a pivoting head of some sort, you can't shoot verticals. Not on a lens with a rotating mount, Paul. The Tokina has a lovely one that clicks into place at 90 degree intervals, and is then tightened. Moreover, the recommemded stance for holding a monopd is to brace it toward you at an

Re: A few quick release questions

2002-03-21 Thread Cotty
I've done this for a while with my Tamron (does no-one in the UK have big _Pentax_ glass?) Mike. Someone does, now. Pray tell, whoever you are. Hope it's coming to the PDML meet... I don't think he's on the list. I would have thought that at the rate we buy kit, it was in