RE: APO Lenses

2001-11-28 Thread Kent Gittings
--- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rodger Whitlock Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 11:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: APO Lenses On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 at 19:12:30 -0500, "Isaac Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean down to the

Re: APO Lenses

2001-11-27 Thread Rodger Whitlock
On Mon, 26 Nov 2001 at 19:12:30 -0500, "Isaac Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You mean down to the photon!? Who's BSing now? We aren't > talking about a machine shop, we're talking about light. It is > literally impossible to grind lenses to within a photon's breadth > of correction.

RE: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-Fangled Color Film)

2001-11-26 Thread Kent Gittings
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 4:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-Fangled Color Film) Yes, but. Whether that common focus is within a tenth of an inch, a hundredth of an inch, or a

RE: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-FangledColor Film)

2001-11-23 Thread Kent Gittings
Gittings -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Brigham Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 6:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-FangledColor Film) I think you are confusing this with

RE: APO Lenses.

2001-11-23 Thread Kent Gittings
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Trucco Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: APO Lenses. >Now this I'd like to hear more about. Can you elaborate on this point, specifically, how do manufacturers get away with labeling a lens as Apochromatic

Re: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-Fangled Color Film)

2001-11-22 Thread Isaac Crawford
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 12:57 PM Subject: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-Fangled Color Film) > Now this I'd like to hear more about. Can you elaborate on this point, > spec

Re: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-FangledColor Film)

2001-11-22 Thread Mike Johnston
Lon wrote: > Maybe not. As I understand it, APO elements, like any other element, > may be a) plastic, b) molded glass, or c) ground glass, with cost > escalating from a (cheapest) to c (pricey). No, you're confusing apochromatic with aspherics, which are made in the types you ennumerate above

Re: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, andNew-FangledColor Film)

2001-11-22 Thread Lon Williamson
Rob Brigham wrote: > > I think you are confusing this with 'Aspherical' - shape of lenses to > correct aberrations. > The Sigma APO refers to a lens coating rather than lens design. You're probably right about the aspherical, but Sigma identifies the number of APO elements in their lenses, so I'

RE: APO Lenses (was Re: Layers, Sharp Focus, and New-Fangled Colo r Film)

2001-11-21 Thread Paris, Leonard
I suspect that they only approach perfection, as a goal, but never actually achieve it. The real world does have to be considered, ya know what I mean? In other words, when you get close enough, you can claim victory. To hold them to having to be perfect because they use the term APO is not reali