Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. august 2004 15:36
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Aussie *ist D Prices
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trevor Bailey wrote:
If I wanted to lay
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trevor Bailey wrote:
I did some pricing today with my local Photographic outlet.
A Canon 300D is about $1700 AU with a Canon EF 24-85 zoom.
A *ist D is about $2500 AU with a poxy Sigma 28-70 f2.8.
I can see why the punters are flocking to the 300D. It only takes a
Chris Stoddart replied...
Well the 'poxy Sigma lens' performance is probably no worse than the
'poxy
Canon lens' at that price point. Also the *ist D competes with the Canon
10D not the 300D, so you need to price it against that. IF (- big if)
we
get a Baby *istD at Photokina then that should
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trevor Bailey wrote:
If I wanted to lay down the cash, I want a Pentax, But price is telling
me 300D Canon. As to the 10D, have never seen one in the flesh.
Trevor,
Price once told you to buy the MZ-60; was that a good decision? How
much money did you lose on it so as to
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
My feeling is that the 300D is a money-pinching instrument on behalf
of Canon, a brutally downsized fill in the right Canon model. I hope
that Graywolf was right in his comments the other day that the Baby-D
will not be the same thing, though
at
the moment.
Original Message Follows
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Aussie *ist D Prices
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 14:35:57 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Trevor Bailey wrote:
If I wanted to lay down the cash, I
6 matches
Mail list logo
