Andre Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>If one locates K bayonet mount to screw adapter B&H price $44.95
>>then K mount lenses can be used on this gear which i am thinking to
>>add but expensive too.
>>Gill
>
>I don't think this is possible as the K mount prones (about 45 or
>46mm in diamet
The K-mount-lens to screw-mount-camera adapter adds considerable space
between the lens and the camera, almost like a teleconverter. It
contains at least one optical element, which allows it to maintain
infinity focus.
Mark Roberts
I see. You loose optical quality, like with the Nikon adapter. I
I have an unusual M42 camera, the Ricoh TLS401. It has a dial on the right
of the pentaprism that allows the user to switch from eye level to waist
level viewing.
Jim A.
> From: "m.s.gill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:01:53 +0500
> To:
> Su
If one locates K bayonet mount to screw adapter B&H price $44.95
then K mount lenses can be used on this gear which i am thinking to
add but expensive too.
Gill
I don't think this is possible as the K mount prones (about 45 or
46mm in diameter) cannot be made to fit inside the 42mm diameter
scr
/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. januar 2005 22:02
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Best M42 body?
The Spotmatic F will give you open aperture meeting with Super Multi Coated
or SMC Takumar lenses. That's a big plus o
etween the SpotF and the earlier Spotties, and the F
and , for example, the K1000, KM, KX with standard screens?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Date: 1/15/2005 10:52:38 AM
Subject: Re: Best M42 body?
I've used 'em all, from Fuji and
gt; Wish me luck!
> And thanks for all the comments.
>
> Don
>
> OH, one last question: Do you suppose the cool Lizard
> Skin I've got for an SP will fit this one?
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
#x27;ve got for an SP will fit this one?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 6:20 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Best M42 body?
>
>
> I've never owned the Singles, but I h
t the finder
> is a bit too dim for me.
> Have you found the F's finder brighter than the Ricoh?
> (if you've tried the Singlex TLS, that is.)
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
finder brighter than the Ricoh?
(if you've tried the Singlex TLS, that is.)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 12:51 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Best M42 body?
>
>
> I&
y effect on the mirror
so if it gets dirty it doesn't cause a problem like the
earlier bodies do...
JCO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 5:40 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Best M42 body?
I prefer my
Don Sanderson asked:
> A while back there was mention of some M42
> mount bodies with superior viewfinders.
> I believe Fujica and Ricoh were among them.
> What M42 bodies have you found to be the
> best as far as viewfinder/weight/features, etc?
I remain partial to the Pentax S3 (aka H3) for how
t; the SPF finder than all the earlier spots
> JCO
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 4:13 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Best M42 body?
>
>
> Ahh ... so it's
PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 4:13 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Best M42 body?
Ahh ... so it's not the viewfinder but the spot's need to be stopped
down in order to meter that's the issue. OK, fair enuf.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[
Open aperture - no. Stop down - yes.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Will aperture stop down/open aperture metering work with a Super Takumar
on
> the K1000 + M42 adapter?
@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Best M42 body?
The Spotmatic F will give you open aperture meeting with Super Multi Coated
or SMC Takumar lenses. That's a big plus over a Spotmatic. It's tough as
nails and said to be almost identical to a K1000, save for the mount. The
only minus is that the meter
Ahh ... so it's not the viewfinder but the spot's need to be stopped down
in order to meter that's the issue. OK, fair enuf.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> The Spotmatic F will give you open aperture meeting with
> Super Multi Coated or SMC Takumar lenses. That's a b
ndard screens?
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To:
> > Date: 1/15/2005 10:52:38 AM
> > Subject: Re: Best M42 body?
> >
> > I've used 'em all, from Fuji and Rich to Mamiya. The all-
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've used 'em all, from Fuji and Rich to Mamiya. The all-around best,
hands down, is the Spotmatic F.
Precisely why I keep mine.
My Spotty F is almost brand new, and it's kept high and dry, 24/7.
I haven't taken it out for a walk in some time. Maybe this will prompt me...
Ne
Is there a difference between the SpotF and the earlier Spotties, and the F
and , for example, the K1000, KM, KX with standard screens?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Date: 1/15/2005 10:52:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Best M42 bo
Like you said that i think the fujica body is good but handly i like
spotmatic.
-Original Message-
From: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 7:01 PM
To: PDML
Subject: Best M42 body?
A while back there was mention of some M42
mount bodies with superio
I've used 'em all, from Fuji and Rich to Mamiya. The all-around best,
hands down, is the Spotmatic F.
On Jan 15, 2005, at 1:00 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
A while back there was mention of some M42
mount bodies with superior viewfinders.
I believe Fujica and Ricoh were among them.
What M42 bodies ha
22 matches
Mail list logo
