On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 3:04 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/octopuppy.html
>
> This is at least one 7 week old Belgian Shepherd (Groenendael).
>
> This also shows off the really sucky bokeh of the EXTREMELY EXPENSIVE
> FA200mm/f4 Macro lens
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 8:55 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Ewins"
> Subject: RE: Cute Puppy
>
>
> > Is the bokeh just as sucky when used for its designed purpose, i.e. macro?
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Ewins"
Subject: RE: Cute Puppy
> Is the bokeh just as sucky when used for its designed purpose, i.e. macro?
>
> I do agree that this would be a good example of bad bokeh.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/peso/pages/IMGP0908.html
Yep a really cute little guy!
But the image doesn't do much for him IMHO.
His head blends in to much with his black featureless body.
More of a side view would be better with this exposure.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:04 AM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/octopuppy.html
>
> This is at least one 7 week old Belgian Shepherd (Groenendael).
Awcute little fur balll...
> This also shows off the really sucky bokeh of the EXTREMELY
Is the bokeh just as sucky when used for its designed purpose, i.e. macro?
I do agree that this would be a good example of bad bokeh.
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
PS, a workmate had a pair of groenendaels and said that their herding
instinct was so strong that he and his wife would exercise
6 matches
Mail list logo