Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-02 Thread Frantisek
tpb> If I'm not mistaken, DX coding allows for coding a film canister for 72 shots. tpb> If so, that means one could put *at least* 72 shots in a tpb> blank canister if you buy film by meters (17 meters is usual I tpb> think). AFAIK Ilford used to make a film on thin base for journalists, it allow

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread Raimo K
AIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:05 AM Subject: Re: DX coding and canister capacity Not unless you use ester-thin base film from Kodak, I'm not even sure that it's still available, (it was a relatively low speed B&W if I recall c

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread Peter J. Alling
Not unless you use ester-thin base film from Kodak, I'm not even sure that it's still available, (it was a relatively low speed B&W if I recall correctly). You could spool 72 frames into a standard cassette. Tri-X could safely go to about 40. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I'm not mistaken, DX co

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2004 07:28 PM >A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Objet : Re: DX coding and canister capacity > > >- Original Message - >From: "Mat Maessen" >Subject: Re: DX coding and canister capacity > > >> It would have to be pretty darned thin film. >> Most I ever

RE: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread Jens Bladt
It's nice you like (or at least are drinking) Danish beer...:-) Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 1. november 2004 20:09 Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Emne: Re: DX coding and can

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, the counter will just stay at 36 which I don't mind, really (in this specific case of course) on my SuperA at least. >- Message Initial - >De : Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Envoy? : Lundi , Novembre 1, 2004 07:09 PM >A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Objet

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Mat Maessen" Subject: Re: DX coding and canister capacity It would have to be pretty darned thin film. Most I ever got into a bulk-loaded roll was 42 shots before it started binding. And I'm not sure I'd do that again. :-) If you're

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread Keith Whaley
Okay, but let me ask...what do you do (assuming mechanical, or more to the point, "not digital" cameras,) with the frame counter? Even if it DID go around twice, there will be confusion when you pass the S or start place, and the couple of empty frames before the 1 shows. Then there's the potent

Re: DX coding and canister capacity

2004-11-01 Thread Mat Maessen
It would have to be pretty darned thin film. Most I ever got into a bulk-loaded roll was 42 shots before it started binding. And I'm not sure I'd do that again. :-) If you're developing your own film, even the 36-shot rolls are about as long as you want to be dealing with in the darkroom. With the