- Original Message -
From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I remember seeing something similar before. It seems the film gets
> > destroyed (rendered unusable for printing or projecting) in the
> > process. I see little or no advantage in using this process, other
> > than red
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 17, 2001 6:13 PM
Subject: RE: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)
> Johan Schoone wrote:
> > In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default>
Johan Schoone wrote:
> In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write:
> >An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of
Photography'=
> >s
> >e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works.
Anyone know if their process only works on C-41 film, or w
Johan Schoone wrote:
>
> In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write:
> >An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of Photography'=
> >s
> >e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works.
>
> [Press release]
>
> I remember seeing something similar be
In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write:
>An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of Photography'=
>s
>e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works.
[Press release]
I remember seeing something similar before. It seems the film gets
destroyed (
5 matches
Mail list logo