Re: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)

2001-05-17 Thread Anthony Farr
- Original Message - From: "John Francis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > I remember seeing something similar before. It seems the film gets > > destroyed (rendered unusable for printing or projecting) in the > > process. I see little or no advantage in using this process, other > > than red

Re: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)

2001-05-17 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Patrick White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: May 17, 2001 6:13 PM Subject: RE: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?) > Johan Schoone wrote: > > In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default>

RE: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)

2001-05-17 Thread Patrick White
Johan Schoone wrote: > In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write: > >An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of Photography'= > >s > >e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works. Anyone know if their process only works on C-41 film, or w

Re: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)

2001-05-17 Thread John Francis
Johan Schoone wrote: > > In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write: > >An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of Photography'= > >s > >e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works. > > [Press release] > > I remember seeing something similar be

Re: Digital dry film process (or vapourware?)

2001-05-17 Thread Johan Schoone
In article <01c0deba$43135e40$0405@default> you write: >An interesting (dry) development from the British Journal of Photography'= >s >e-newsletter. It would be an amazing process if it works. [Press release] I remember seeing something similar before. It seems the film gets destroyed (