Re: First scm-DA14/2.8 impressions

2004-06-29 Thread Mark Roberts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I've got a $500 used Sigma 14/3.5 because I couldn't scrape together $1300 >for a new Nikkor 14/2.8. That 14/2.8 Nikkor is actually a rebadged Tamron. -- Mark Roberts Photography and writing www.robertstech.com

RE: First scm-DA14/2.8 impressions

2004-06-28 Thread edwin
>Say these are correct. How do Canon & Nikon deal with it? Do they have >more effective solution? >Alan Chan 1) Throw more ED and other special glass at it, upping the price of the lens. 2) Optimize to limit CA at the expense of other optical flaws. 3) Supposedly the 14/2.8 Nikkor has problems