For some reason my eyes ended up watching the boats at the bridge shot. I
kind of like what you have done, but it doesn't do anything with me. (At
least not after a first look).
The concert shots are very good, me think, despite the lack of focus. Or
perhaps it is the lack of focus that makes the
Hi!
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11_lavender/10.htm
Frankly (no pun intended), I think it does not
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.net.au/~der
In a message dated 11/28/2005 4:16:54 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
mirror slap isn't that critical).
http://members.iinet.
Even if the mirror rattled for nearly a
second, shaking the camera like a leaf,
it would still be only ~3% of the
exposure time -- nothing at all to worry
about.
Don
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated
On 11/28/05, Derby Chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Taken with the mighty super-multi-coated Takumar 300mm/f4 and 6x7 with
> no MLU. Still pretty sharp (although it is a 30s exposure, so I guess
> mirror slap isn't that critical).
>
> http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/index5/05_11
6 matches
Mail list logo