RE: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-28 Thread Jens Bladt
PROTECTED] Emne: Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia Or simply because Sigma is more famous than Pentax. Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan >Because there is a higher profit margin on Sigma lenses? _

Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-28 Thread Peter Loveday
Then why on earth do Kennedy's fail to market Pentax lenses with the cameras. Every 'package' they promote has Sigma lens rather than Pentax! Comes with being sole importer/distributor for both I guess. Can anyone say "conflict of interests" Love, Light and Peace, - Peter Loveday Director of De

Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-27 Thread Alan Chan
Or simply because Sigma is more famous than Pentax. Regards, Alan Chan http://www.pbase.com/wlachan Because there is a higher profit margin on Sigma lenses? _ Add photos to your e-mail with MSN Premium. Get 2 months FREE* http://join

Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-27 Thread graywolf
Because there is a higher profit margin on Sigma lenses? -- John Coyle wrote: Then why on earth do Kennedy's fail to market Pentax lenses with the cameras. Every 'package' they promote has Sigma lens rather than Pentax! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Leon Altoff

Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-27 Thread Rob Studdert
On 28 May 2004 at 10:20, John Coyle wrote: > Then why on earth do Kennedy's fail to market Pentax lenses with the > cameras. Every 'package' they promote has Sigma lens rather than Pentax! I guess Smega lenses offer a higher profit ratio? If that's not a conflict nothing is, but hell it's been

Re: Interesting article about Pentax in Australia

2004-05-27 Thread John Coyle
Then why on earth do Kennedy's fail to market Pentax lenses with the cameras. Every 'package' they promote has Sigma lens rather than Pentax! John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Leon Altoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2004 5: