Mark Roberts wrote:
I agree. I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on digital.
I'd tweak your sentence as follows:
I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL on the *istD.
With the *istDS, the plain old TTL works very well, enough you can hardly
find any difference.
Dario
--
PDML
AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Thanks for that reply mate.
I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with
the
camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to
get
right? Oh well, I'll just keep dialling in flash
Metz will come out with some upgrade
sooner or later. All I want is just TTL.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J and K Messervy
Sent: 05 January, 2007 1:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
/RiceHighs_Pentax_K100D_Full_Revi
ew.html#P-TTL_Exposure_Accuracy
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: 05 January, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Well, you won't get just TTL with a K10D
- Original Message -
From: Henk Terhell
Subject: RE: K10D with AF540FGZ
I was considering buying a Pentax P-TTL flash because my good old Metz
32MZ-3, working so fine in TTL-mode with the *istD, let me down now with
the K10D. In A-mode this flash unit is working OK with the K10D
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J and K Messervy
Sent: 05 January, 2007 1:23 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Thanks for that reply mate.
I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl
On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I want is just TTL.
Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box...
Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss IMO.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It worked quite a bit better on the Ds.
David Savage wrote:
On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I want is just TTL.
Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box...
Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss
: 05 January, 2007 12:24 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Well, you won't get just TTL with a K10D.
With a K10D you can use manual, auto or P-TTL. You will NEVER be able to
use TTL with a K10D, the camera does not support it.
2007/1/5, Henk Terhell [EMAIL
David Savage wrote:
On 1/6/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All I want is just TTL.
Too bad Pentax no longer includes the TTL sensor in the mirror box...
Considering how hit and miss it was on the D, it's not much of a loss
IMO.
I agree. I found P-TTL to be vastly superior to TTL
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:43:21PM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote:
Well, that will be another reason to keep my *istD as backup. See also
the critical notes on the absence of support of TTL in the newer Pentax
models, and the underexposure of P-TTL of the K100D built-in flash in
the article by
J and K Messervy wrote:
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
indoors and out.
First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot indoors of my kids or
similar at quite close range,
Except that lack of TTL flash turns some of the not-so-old Pentax flashes
(such as my 330 FTZ) into purely manual guns which are actually less useful
than some of the really old guns (like the AF280T) which at least have an auto
sensor in the gun.
The 330 FTZ gives good results in TTL mode on
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:43:21PM +0100, Henk Terhell wrote:
Well, that will be another reason to keep my *istD as backup. See also
the critical notes on the absence of support of TTL in the newer Pentax
I know. My AF 500 FTZ now sits idle most of the time. I use it now and
then in manual as a slave studio flash.
Cheers,
Dave
On 1/6/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Except that lack of TTL flash turns some of the not-so-old Pentax flashes
(such as my 330 FTZ) into purely manual guns
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
indoors and out.
First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
little disappointing. I'm finding that for a shot
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ
I received my flash the other day and have been playing with it a bit
indoors and out.
First impressions are good, however the exposure results in P-TTL are a
little disappointing. I'm
easy enough to do.
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 11:13 AM
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy Subject: K10D with AF540FGZ
I received
Have you tried making sure that you're using the catch
panel when bouncing off the ceiling? I've found that
it works perfectly this way. It sends just enough
diffused light directly toward the subject (and adds a
nice catch light in the eyes).
I use it this way and have no need for compensation
I use the bounce card but usually have my iso set to 100.
- Original Message -
From: Brendan MacRae [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Have you tried making sure that you're using
- Original Message -
From: J and K Messervy
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Thanks for that reply mate.
I find it annoying that it doesn't expose correctly in p-ttl and with the
camera in auto mode. Surely that is the basic requirement for them to get
right? Oh well, I'll just
]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:03 PM
Subject: Re: K10D with AF540FGZ
Have you tried making sure that you're using the
catch
panel when bouncing off the ceiling? I've found
that
it works perfectly this way. It sends just enough
diffused
22 matches
Mail list logo