Adam Maas wrote:
I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron
28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is
superior to either.
-Adam
Just saw this...
the M I have (maybe not the very first one) is what I've been putting on
the darkside camera
to shoot
On 3/21/2010 8:30 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 19 March 2010 08:33, Steven Desjardins wrote:
How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
to the point) one to avoid?
--
Steve Desjardins
If you're willing to step outside the brand, The Vivitar 28mm f/2 is
very nice
entax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Manual Focus 28
Sent: Mar 21, 2010 10:09 PM
On 3/19/10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
> to the point) one to avoid?
The M28/3.5 is razor sharp, readily available and relatively inexpen
On 3/19/10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
> to the point) one to avoid?
The M28/3.5 is razor sharp, readily available and relatively inexpensive.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discu
On Mar 21, 2010, at 9:30 PM, Miserere wrote:
> On 19 March 2010 08:33, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
>> to the point) one to avoid?
>>
>> --
>> Steve Desjardins
>
> If you're willing to step outside the brand, The Vivitar 28mm
On 19 March 2010 08:33, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
> to the point) one to avoid?
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
If you're willing to step outside the brand, The Vivitar 28mm f/2 is
very nice in the Komine flavour (49mm filter ring a
>
> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one
> or (more to the point) one to avoid?
>
There is a SMCP 28/2 - neither M nor A - which is very good. Big and heavy
but outstanding optical performance.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:58 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> On 3/19/2010 10:32 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>> I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron
>> 28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is
>> superior to either.
>>
>
> Interesting. I have an adaptall 28 a
On 3/19/2010 10:32 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron
28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is
superior to either.
Interesting. I have an adaptall 28 at home.
How does it compare with the vivitar series 1 28-105 at 28
I've owned the A and M(1st version) 28/2.8's and now use a Tamron
28/2.5 Adaptall-2. The A was decent, the M poor, the Tamron is
superior to either.
-Adam
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> How do the M and A
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 5:33 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
> to the point) one to avoid?
The A28/2.8 was one of my first Pentax lenses. It was a little soft
wide-open, very sharp by f/4-5.6, and had beautiful bokeh throughout.
rom: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob
Sullivan
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 10:22 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Manual Focus 28
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
experience with the M28/3.5. The M28/2.0 is classy.
I beleive the M, A and F 28 f2.8's all have the identical optical
formulas, (well there's an earl and late M version, which was
different). All were, at one time, considered mediocre performers
though If you're deciding between these three I'd get the F if I had
a choice, (better coatings a
Mat Maessen wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
>> The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
>
>There are actually two versions of the M28/2.8.
>
>I suspect you're referring to the "old" version.
>The "new" version is mechanically and optically
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
There are actually two versions of the M28/2.8.
I suspect you're referring to the "old" version.
The "new" version is mechanically and optically identical to the
A28/2.8. O
On Mar 19, 2010, at 9:22, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
> experience with the M28/3.5. The M28/2.0 is classy. And the K28/3.5
> isan old sharpie!
> I think the A28/2.8 is a bit sharper than the M28/2.8, but the plastic
> aperture ring c
The M28/2.8 is soft and prone to sticky aperture blades. I have no
experience with the M28/3.5. The M28/2.0 is classy. And the K28/3.5
isan old sharpie!
I think the A28/2.8 is a bit sharper than the M28/2.8, but the plastic
aperture ring can be a problem. It falls apart internaly. I suppose
th
Mark Roberts wrote:
>There's an M and a K 28/3.5 (don't know if they're the same optical
>design)
Just checked and they're definitely different designs
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/wide-angle/index.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Steven Desjardins wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> Steven Desjardins wrote:
>>
>>>How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
>>>to the point) one to avoid?
>>
>> The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
>>
>That's an M, right?
There's a
That's an M, right?
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>>How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
>>to the point) one to avoid?
>
> The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDM
Steven Desjardins wrote:
>How do the M and A 28's compare? Is there a really good one or (more
>to the point) one to avoid?
The 28mm f/3.5 lenses are the ones to get.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pl
21 matches
Mail list logo
