EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. april 2005 18:37
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: No 135/2.5 today!
>>> Clicking on any of the images on that URL, to enlarge them, brings up a
>>> window showing a brick wall, with entirely different lenses!
>> Yes - same here...
>
>>> Clicking on any of the images on that URL, to enlarge them, brings up a
>>> window showing a brick wall, with entirely different lenses!
>> Yes - same here...
> I didn't notice that little Full Size button at the very bottom.
Oh - I see the "little Full Size button" now. (It is "off the bot
> Clicking on any of the images on that URL, to enlarge them, brings up a
> window showing a brick wall, with entirely different lenses!
Yes - same here...
Fred
Excellent! Thanks...
I didn't notice that little Full Size button at the very bottom.
Great performance indeed!
I don't know how that K- lens compares to my Super-Multi-Coated Takumar
135/2.5, but mine performs very well wide open.
I have other 135s I've not yet found the time to check out thoroug
. april 2005 17:01
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: No 135/2.5 today!
Jens Bladt wrote:
> Well, they are woth what they sell for :-)
> This is rather expensive, but with the hood and all it's not too bad.
> And it's rare, not a very common lens. At least it took me some
Jens Bladt wrote:
Well, they are woth what they sell for :-)
This is rather expensive, but with the hood and all it's not too bad.
And it's rare, not a very common lens. At least it took me some time to find
one.
I paid appr. 100 USD for mine a year or two ago.
Its a very nice lens. Sharp wide ope
- Original Message -
From: "John Forbes"
Subject: Re: No 135/2.5 today!
He only buys MF lenses. Probably not a D owner.
Really?
William Robb
Well, they are woth what they sell for :-)
This is rather expensive, but with the hood and all it's not too bad.
And it's rare, not a very common lens. At least it took me some time to find
one.
I paid appr. 100 USD for mine a year or two ago.
Its a very nice lens. Sharp wide open.
see my test char
John Forbes wrote:
He only buys MF lenses. Probably not a D owner.
Hey, I'm a DS owner with no AF lenses... although in my case this is due
to budgetary issues... ;-)
S
I don't know exactly what they're worth, but I paid $89 for mine - excellent
condition, no hood - at a local camera store. They tend to underprice the
Pentax stuff.
- Original Message -
From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML"
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:30 PM
Subject: No
He only buys MF lenses. Probably not a D owner.
John
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 21:55:38 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Don Sanderson" Subject: RE: No
135/2.5 today!
I'll care, if I ever manage to get one. :-(
Here's
- Original Message -
From: "Don Sanderson"
Subject: RE: No 135/2.5 today!
I'll care, if I ever manage to get one. :-(
Here's another lens that did very well:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7504661631
Check the buyers recent auctions.
He is
I think "Holy Buckets" must be an Iowa saying. The only other person
I've ever heard say that is from the Des Moines area.
Glenn
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7504661223
Holy Buckets, I got tromped!
After Cotty's
Hi!
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7504661223
Holy Buckets, I got tromped!
After Cotty's "Jumping Jupiter" this would be the second best thing I
learned on PDML in spoken English category :).
Then of course, we programmers, should change t
mine was half that price, and i consider it a steal.
mishka
On Apr 5, 2005 9:30 PM, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7504661223
>
> Holy Buckets, I got tromped!
> What ARE these things worth?
>
> Don
>
>
On 5 Apr 2005 at 20:30, Don Sanderson wrote:
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7504661223
>
> Holy Buckets, I got tromped!
> What ARE these things worth?
That's not bad glass for the $, mine sold late 2002 with hood as hard case for
US$227.50
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRA
Dang, I bought an ME with this lens last year for about $120. Some guy
emailed me later asking if I would sell him the lens for my final bid +
$10. I told him that it was the lens that I was after, not the ME body.
Anyone wanna buy an ME (black) body? LOL.
rg
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://cgi
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 8:44 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: No 135/2.5 today!
>
>
> Hi Don ...
>
> One of my buyers recently paid $251.00 for one. Maybe $200.00 is a bit
> st
Hi Don ...
One of my buyers recently paid $251.00 for one. Maybe $200.00 is a bit
steep, but, if I were looking for one today and came across a good sample,
knowing what I know about then lens, I'd pop for the $200.00.
BTW, the best hood for that lens is the 58mm for the Takumar 200/4.0 (I
belie
19 matches
Mail list logo
