RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-25 Thread David A. Mann
Cotty writes: Never mind - if I want to send in something shot on non-Pentax equipment I know that I'll have to lie about it. Doesn't worry me. I find that rather sad. I found it quite funny as I assumed it was tongue-in-cheek. I am sure we all thought exactly the same thing when the

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-24 Thread John Francis
If your need is so great, fine. Lie to us. We won't know the difference. You will. The question is then, Will it matter to you that you lied to show off your shot? I can't answer this. Only you can. Regards, Bob... My, Shel was right - it *did* get nasty, didn't it? I don't need to

Re: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-24 Thread Aaron Reynolds
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 02:17 PM, John Francis wrote: I don't need to lie to you to get my images shown anywhere. But if it matter to you that much, don't worry - I'd be quite happy to have all my images removed from the Pentax gallery. I don't think I'll bother to submit to any

Re: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-24 Thread tom
John Francis wrote: My, Shel was right - it *did* get nasty, didn't it? I don't need to lie to you to get my images shown anywhere. But if it matter to you that much, don't worry - I'd be quite happy to have all my images removed from the Pentax gallery. I don't think I'll bother to

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-24 Thread Cotty
Never mind - if I want to send in something shot on non-Pentax equipment I know that I'll have to lie about it. Doesn't worry me. I find that rather sad. :-( Cotty ___ Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MacAds traffic to [EMAIL

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Skofteland, Christian
Don't start that again When I first joined the list a few months ago there was a lot of angry messages flying around about what is acceptable and what is not. Christian Skofteland -Original Message- From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Which reminds me ... when

Re: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe the discussion at that time. Skofteland, Christian wrote: Don't start that again When I first joined the list a few months ago there was a lot of angry messages flying around about what is acceptable and what is not. From: John

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Juan J. Buhler
Which reminds me ... when did the PUG suddenly become so restrictive? When I unsubscribed a few months ago for my European vacation it was OK to use just about anything on non-themed months, although use of Pentax equipment was requested for the themed galleries. Now, however, I find

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Skofteland, Christian
ok, how about heated? Christian Skofteland -Original Message- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe the discussion at that time. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Brendan
No heated is too mild a word. --- Skofteland, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, how about heated? Christian Skofteland -Original Message- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe the discussion at that time.

RE: Non-Pentax equipment

2001-10-23 Thread Ed
://lightandsilver.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Skofteland, Christian Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:56 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Non-Pentax equipment ok, how about heated? Christian Skofteland -Original