Cotty writes:
Never mind - if I want to send in something shot on non-Pentax
equipment I know that I'll have to lie about it. Doesn't worry me.
I find that rather sad.
I found it quite funny as I assumed it was tongue-in-cheek. I am sure we all
thought exactly the same thing when the
If your need is so great, fine. Lie to us. We won't know the
difference. You will. The question is then, Will it matter
to you that you lied to show off your shot? I can't answer
this. Only you can.
Regards,
Bob...
My, Shel was right - it *did* get nasty, didn't it?
I don't need to
On Wednesday, October 24, 2001, at 02:17 PM, John Francis wrote:
I don't need to lie to you to get my images shown anywhere.
But if it matter to you that much, don't worry - I'd be quite
happy to have all my images removed from the Pentax gallery.
I don't think I'll bother to submit to any
John Francis wrote:
My, Shel was right - it *did* get nasty, didn't it?
I don't need to lie to you to get my images shown anywhere.
But if it matter to you that much, don't worry - I'd be quite
happy to have all my images removed from the Pentax gallery.
I don't think I'll bother to
Never mind - if I want to send in something shot on non-Pentax
equipment I know that I'll have to lie about it. Doesn't worry me.
I find that rather sad.
:-(
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL
Don't start that again When I first joined the list a few months ago
there was a lot of angry messages flying around about what is acceptable and
what is not.
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: John Francis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Which reminds me ... when
Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe the discussion at
that time.
Skofteland, Christian wrote:
Don't start that again When I first
joined the list a few months ago
there was a lot of angry messages flying
around about what is acceptable and
what is not.
From: John
Which reminds me ... when did the PUG suddenly become so restrictive?
When I unsubscribed a few months ago for my European vacation it was
OK to use just about anything on non-themed months, although use of
Pentax equipment was requested for the themed galleries.
Now, however, I find
ok, how about heated?
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe the discussion at
that time.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to
No heated is too mild a word.
--- Skofteland, Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ok, how about heated?
Christian Skofteland
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Perhaps angry s far to strong a word to describe
the discussion at
that time.
://lightandsilver.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Skofteland, Christian
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 2:56 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Non-Pentax equipment
ok, how about heated?
Christian Skofteland
-Original
11 matches
Mail list logo