You have mail =)
Ecke
2010/8/9 Stan Halpin :
> My father-in-law's house, to which we will be moving soon, includes a fully
> equipped darkroom. Two enlargers [Bessler 23C Series II with Universal
> Colorhead, the other has no visible nameplate, looks kinda like an Omega but
> isn't; lenses incl
s!
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 8:06 PM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: OT: Darkroom temperature control.
> >
> >
&
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter"
Subject: Re: OT: Darkroom temperature control.
Unfortunately the tap water here runs 70-74 degrees at its
coldest in summer.
--
I have seen (but never patronized) photo-processing places in Mali, where
I have e
I guess I'll take 74 and like it. ;-)
Geez, they must develop Tri-X in like 22 and a half seconds!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Joseph Tainter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 16, 2005 8:06 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: OT:
Unfortunately the tap water here runs 70-74 degrees at its
coldest in summer.
--
I have seen (but never patronized) photo-processing places in Mali,
where I have experienced temperatures of 140 F (60 C). These places do
not have any sort of cooling. I have always wondered how they proc
I spent years working with water baths and other stuff to stabilize
and control temperature. Then, I got fed up with all of it and
decided to experiment ... I only ever processed B&W film at home:
- standardized on two developers (HC-110 and XTOL). Then stuck with
XTOL.
- went to one-shot
At one time I had the cooling unit for an old water fountain setup as a water
chiller in my dark room. Worked well with a temp control valve. Chillers were
the standard in pro darkrooms in days gone by, but now they usually us high
temps and chillers have kind of disappeared from the darkroom c
http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/toys/60ad/
I suppose you could hack together some sort of thermostat that drops
into your bottles/tanks, and then point the unit right at them. ;)
On 7/15/05, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just purchased the components to design and build so
With most of pro studios and bigger freelancers moved to digital
backs, I saw an influx of cheap JOBO processors. I got one myself for
about 100 Euro (and that was more than year before) with all the
accessories and tanks (the middle grade model with lift), for
developig B&W...
I guess elsewhere t
I got the little rollers that will let me spin it manually.
They'll be hot-glued to a base this week. Looks to be a really convenient system. I
just have to figure out the time changes and develop a consistent rolling practice.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
'Politi
Rollers? Mechanical processor?
-Mat
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:25:48 -0400, Collin Brendemuehl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If anyone is wanting cheap darkroom stuff, boy is it really getting cheap. Midwest
> Photo has a bunch of used Jobo stuff.
> I got a small tank, 4x5 holder, daylight non-mechan
Shel,
Thanks for the info. It's odd, really.
When I did some T-Max there were no bubbles.
Only on Tri-X.
I've learned since that the Yankee 4x5 daylight
tank is notorious for being bubble-tolerant.
Also, the identical instruction was gotten from
the LF guy at Midwest Photo here in Columbus.
Appar
Sounds like a pre-wetting problem. I now let the tank run for about 4
minutes with 1/100 ilfotol (Same thing as Kodak's Phto-flo wetting agent).
I use a Jobo, so its constant agitation.
I had the same problem on a couple of rolls i did in a hurry a few months
ago, and that was the problem.
Ch
Collin ...
Do you bang the tank down on the workspace after each
agitation cycle to dislodge air bubbles?
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> What I'm not enjoying in the darkroom is a new problem.
> My T-Max development went ok once I figured out times.
> But my Tri-X film has spots on it. Even-sized
I found out that it wasn't in the fixer long enough.
Putting it back for an extra few minutes "fixed" it.
Thanks,
Collin
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
<>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.
Nope, that's T-Max. A good hypo clearing agent will take a lot of that
out...
Norm
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> I developed some T-Max 400 (4x5) this a.m.
> 2 batches, 2 sheets each batch.
> The image content is fine, except,
> what would be clear is a pinkish-orangish tone.
> Barely transparent.
At 09:24 PM 05/09/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:15 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: OT: Darkroo
No. Any B&W developer will do, but dilutions and times can be
tricky.
At 08:22 PM 05/09/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
>
>Tx,
>Collin
>
>* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
> <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <>< <><
>
> In a message dated 5/9/2001 7:27:41 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
> >
> > Tx,
> > Collin
> >
With T-Max 400, I've had better success using D-76 1:1. I generally rate
the film at 320 and soup it for 10 minu
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 9:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Darkroom
>
>
> In a message dated 5/9/2001 7:27:41 PM US Easte
In a message dated 5/9/2001 7:27:41 PM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
>
> Tx,
> Collin
>
No. I dislike tmax developer and use D-76 instead.
Ed
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go t
No.
You can find numerous options here:
http://www.digitaltruth.comphoto/devchart.html
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
>
> Must tmax film be developed with tmax developer?
--
Shel Belinkoff
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Grain is the brushstroke of photography." - Man Ray
-
This message is from the Pent
Michael Nosal wrote:
>
> >I may try it again, reducing the exposure for the lightbox another stop.
> >
> >You can tell I was in the middle of a session by all the discarded paper
> >on the floor...
> >
>
> What's the camera and lens next to the lightbox?
ZX-5n and 85/1.4.
tv
-
This message is
>I may try it again, reducing the exposure for the lightbox another stop.
>
>You can tell I was in the middle of a session by all the discarded paper
>on the floor...
>
What's the camera and lens next to the lightbox?
--mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> tom wrote:
> >
> > This book rocks:
> >
> > Black & White : Photographic Printing Workshop
> > by Larry Bartlett (Photographer), Jon Tarrant
>
> > I wonder if that second to last review is Shel's?
>
> No, it's not. I wasn't familiar with the book, but based on
> comm
tom wrote:
>
> This book rocks:
>
> Black & White : Photographic Printing Workshop
> by Larry Bartlett (Photographer), Jon Tarrant
> I wonder if that second to last review is Shel's?
No, it's not. I wasn't familiar with the book, but based on
comments I've read, and your endorsement, I just
26 matches
Mail list logo
