On 3/2/2010 12:55 PM, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere wrote:
I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
"Losing"?
I've been donating it to Cotty...
Bad move, look at what he's done with i
And thats why ad exec's were not allowed into the Python writers room.;-)
Dave
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 5:47 AM, eckinator wrote:
> in true advertising lingo it would read
>
> Our more than one weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
>
> Our far more than two weapons are fear,
2010/3/3 John Sessoms :
>>> > If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, shouldn't we
>>> > at least spell it: "Illuminaughty"?
>>
>> No one expects the illuminaughty
>
> Delusion-naughty OTOH.
Delusinati sounds a lot more deceptive. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
From: David J Brooks
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, ? wrote:
>
>> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
>> ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
>
> If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, s
2010/3/3 frank theriault :
>
> Our two weapons are fear and surprise...and ruthless efficiency
>
> Our *three* weapons are fear, surprise, and ruthless efficiency...and
> an almost fanatical devotion to Pentax
>
> Our *four*...no... *Amongst* our weapons Amongst our
> weaponry...are suc
>>> I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
>>
>>
>>"Losing"?
>>
>>
>
>I've been donating it to Cotty...
I won't tell you where I've been sticking it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 6:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, wrote:
>>
>>> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
>>> ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
>>
>> If we're going to abi
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:52 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, wrote:
>
>> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
>> ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
>
> If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, shouldn't we
> at least spe
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, wrote:
> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could we call
> ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
If we're going to abide by the Truth in Advertising law, shouldn't we
at least spell it: "Illuminaughty"?
Darren Addy
Kearney, NE
--
PDML Pe
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Oh Hell, what did Milton Berl know anyway!
Fashion statements.??
Dave
>
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>>> >
>>> >So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
>>>
>>> If we're a secret society devoted t
Oh Hell, what did Milton Berl know anyway!
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Bob W wrote:
>> >
>> >So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
>>
>> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could
>> we call ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
>>
>
> The Pha
> >
> >So much for secret societies.;-) I have a name in mind, lets guess.
>
> If we're a secret society devoted to photography, how could
> we call ourselves anything but "The Illuminati"?
>
The Phalacrocorax Deceitful Masonic Lodge?
In Paradise Lost the cormorant is a symbol of deception, re
2010/3/2 Miserere :
> On a more serious note, having just spent a whole weekend moving my
> blog/website to its new theme, I have even more respect for the the
> work Mark is putting in to this whole affair. Not only did he
> implement the upload form, but he's also going to deal with all the
> sof
2010/3/2 David J Brooks :
>> In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
>> on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
>> several points for ambitiousness, but loses a lot more for treachery
>> ;-) I suppose we should consider it a compliment that pub
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
We blame it on Doug.
Dave
>
> Thanks, Mark!
>
>
> --M.
>
>
> --
>
> http://EnticingTheLight.com
> A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1 March 2010 22:27, Mark Roberts w
frank theriault wrote:
>On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere wrote:
>
>
>> I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
>
>
>"Losing"?
>
>
I've been donating it to Cotty...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Miserere wrote:
> I think now I know why Mark is losing his hair...
"Losing"?
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to U
On a more serious note, having just spent a whole weekend moving my
blog/website to its new theme, I have even more respect for the the
work Mark is putting in to this whole affair. Not only did he
implement the upload form, but he's also going to deal with all the
software pains of getting our pic
m...@robertstech.com wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
several points for ambitiousness, but loses
Got it - thanks Luiz.
On Mar 2, 2010, at 10:03 AM, Luiz Felipe wrote:
> message from Stan reads:
> .
> .Thank you Mark and also your fellow editors.
> .
> .I was just poking around on your site trying to se the final list of
> contributors. I saw it before when it popped up after I had done my
Surely we'd be called The Asahi... :-)
--M.
On 02/03/2010, m...@robertstech.com wrote:
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
>>On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>>> In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
>>> on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, nev
Thank you Mark and also your fellow editors.
I was just poking around on your site trying to se the final list of
contributors. I saw it before when it popped up after I had done my
submissions, but I can't find a link now that would take me back there...
stan
On Mar 1, 2010, at 9:27 PM, Mark
David J Brooks wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>> In other news, we also received submissions from someone who *isn't*
>> on the PDML and, as far as Doug can tell, never has been! He gets
>> several points for ambitiousness, but loses a lot more for treachery
>> ;-)
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
. But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
> up. You've all risen to the occasion, apparently.
So, mine are out then.;-)
>
> The submission period was extended a day, by the way, to give some
> extra time for our "recently hos
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
> up. You've all risen to the occasion, apparently.
I wouldn't have thought that was possible, but it's good news indeed!
Thanks again for your hard work.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> We've closed down the submissions page for the 2010 PSML book. We had
> more participating photographers than last year and more total images
> submitted. But beyond that, the *quality* of what we received is way
> up. You've all risen to the
26 matches
Mail list logo
