On 1/26/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kids can use keyboards standing on their head :-).
I've got a pic from Christmas - it didn't turn out quite as well as
I'd hoped - with Catherine, my 17 year old, holding a phone receiver
in the crook of her neck, with a Gameboy SP balance
Kids can use keyboards standing on their head :-).
-- Original message --
From: keith_w <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bob Sullivan wrote:
>
> > That's a satisfying family scene Paul. I envy you... Bob S.
>
>
> > On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
Bob Sullivan wrote:
That's a satisfying family scene Paul. I envy you... Bob S.
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
Except...what I've
That's a satisfying family scene Paul. I envy you... Bob S.
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
> course.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
>
>
I'm sure we can work something out.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2006, at 6:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 25/1/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?phot
HAR! I had to take another look to see where you were going with that.
Thanks for looking.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2006, at 5:48 PM, Trevor Bailey wrote:
G'day Paul.
Nice.
I would have called it " You have to eat SOMETHING !"
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Australia
-Original Message-
From: Pau
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 25/1/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
>>course.
>>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
>
>Product placement. Love it :-)
Nice products, too! How much f
G'day Paul.
Nice.
I would have called it " You have to eat SOMETHING !"
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Australia
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2006 11:16 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Hey! Let Me See!
Pooh wa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, you'll see some digital noise at ISO 800, but it's generally less
noticeable than the grain of an ISO 800 color negative film. I try to avoid
shooting at 1600, although again I think the noise is less obtrusive than the
grain of an ISO 1600 film.
FWIW, I agree w
Yes, you'll see some digital noise at ISO 800, but it's generally less
noticeable than the grain of an ISO 800 color negative film. I try to avoid
shooting at 1600, although again I think the noise is less obtrusive than the
grain of an ISO 1600 film.
Paul
-- Original message --
Thank you, Paul,
The reason I asked is that the pictures I take with my *istDS using
ambient (usually incandescent) light trend to look as if the grain size
is increased. I see the same trend in this picture.
It might not be really grain, it might be the sensor noise.
This can be seen in the are
I believe it was 800. I'm not on my home computer now, so I can't check the
EXIF (and it's stripped from the web image), but I shoot almost all my interior
available light shots at 800.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Igor Roshchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Wed, 25
I see what you're saying. It could be presented in a diffferent manner by
bringing down the middle of the curve. However, I wanted to complement the
sunny mood suggested by the background highlights. You're right it is more a
matter of preference.
Paul
-- Original message -
On 25/1/06, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I thought you were moving house and out of our hair - er, I mean, busy
>- for the next few days...
I'm always there, in your face, cycle boy.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.co
Wed, 25 Jan 2006 04:19:16 -0800
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of course.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
>
Paul,
What ISO was used here?
Igor
It looks over exposed on my calibrated monitor. The thing is, the
histogram looks great, and, technically, one could say the exposure is spot
on. However, there's no mood in the photo. Just bringing down the curve a
bit in the mid range creates a much stronger image, IMO. Maybe it's not
your st
It's not overexposed. Looks fine on a calibrated monitor and the histogram is
clipped only by the blown highlights on the chairs. But thanks for looking.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> The entire photo loo
Hi Paul,
The entire photo looks over exposed to me. It's also too "busy" and the
blown out chairs are a real distraction. As a "slice of life" it just
doesn't cut it for me, on any level. A much tighter crop on the woman
viewing the computer screen and the bear looking over her shoulder, would
m
Hi Paul,
The entire photo looks over exposed to me. It's also too "busy" and the
blown out chairs are a real distraction. As a "slice of life" it just
doesn't cut it for me, on any level. A much tighter crop on the woman
viewing the computer screen and the bear looking over her shoulder, would
Thanks Marnie. Yep, the chairs are goners. I pulled them down in the RAW
converter and again with highlight/shadows (at 100%!), but there's at least 12
stops difference.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In a message dated 1/25/2006 4:40:23 AM
In a message dated 1/25/2006 4:40:23 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nice slice of life shot. I like how it makes me follow all the
different eye lines.
Dave.
What he said. There are things not to like, like the blown out chairs. But I
think that's pretty much a quib
On 1/25/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Product placement. Love it :-)
>
Cotty,
I thought you were moving house and out of our hair - er, I mean, busy
- for the next few days...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
On 25/1/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
>course.
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
Product placement. Love it :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In truth, it would probably take only a few minutes, but it would
> eliminate the feeling that her face is lit by the screen. Everything
> would be more uniform. Still, there may be room for improvement.
I agree that seeing her face lit by th
In truth, it would probably take only a few minutes, but it would
eliminate the feeling that her face is lit by the screen. Everything
would be more uniform. Still, there may be room for improvement.
Paul
On Jan 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PR
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Frank. Yes, it's yellow overall because the main light source is
> tungsten. But my daughter's face is illuminated by the computer screen.
Yeah, I noticed that, Paul. I figued her face was the reason that you
chose not to adjust the
Thanks Frank. Yes, it's yellow overall because the main light source is
tungsten. But my daughter's face is illuminated by the computer screen.
If I set the color temperature to bring down the yellow, she would turn
blue as would the background. So I chose to keep the tungsten
illuminated part
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
> course.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
I like it, Paul! You caught everyone looking just the right way.
It's very yellow to my eye, though (m
Nice slice of life shot. I like how it makes me follow all the
different eye lines.
Dave.
On 1/25/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pooh wants in. FA 50/1.4 on the *istD. f2.4 @ 1/20th. Handheld of
> course.
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4058489&size=lg
>
>
29 matches
Mail list logo
