Beautiful scene. I like how you framed that waterfall and used
foreground elements to convey the sense of it being hidden. Very nice!
Mark
On 2/20/2013 4:02 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Comments
Thanks, Aahz!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Aahz Maruch a...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
That's beautiful, Dan!
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: February 20, 2013 2/20/13
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Hidden Waterfall
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
Thanks, Frank.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:00 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
That's beautiful, Dan!
Cheers,
frank
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent:
one of the things that make it worthwhile, clearly :-)
ann
On 2/20/2013 16:02, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Comments and criticisms are always welcome.
Dan Matyola
Yes, there are a number of nice waterfalls on the way to Hana, then
even nicer ones in the National Park, that can be reached by walking
30-45 minutes. Some of the best ones require a much longer hike,
however, but unfortunately I didn't have the time for that this time
around.
Dan Matyola
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
One of the sights on the infamous Road to Hana:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16938592
Nice framing!
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6http://rule6.info/
* * *
Help a
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:48:23 -0400, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to post this anyway, careful subject choice will minimize
how noticeable the fisheye effect is.
Here's an example which I think does just that.
Just wanted to throw in that it's easier to mask the fisheye-ness of
longer focal length fisheyes than shorter focal length ones. That is,
it'll be easier to take a normal looking shot with a 16mm FE than an
8mm FE.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:14:23 -0400
Subject: Re: PESO-Hidden Waterfall was[Re: fisheye
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:08:51 +0100, John Whittingham wrote:
Aren't all the shorter ones (8mm) circular fisheyes as opposed to diagonal?
As far as I know. That's what makes it harder to get a normal
looking photo from them. You have to crop out a _tiny_ portion of the
center of the shot. :-)
11 matches
Mail list logo
