In a message dated 4/1/2009 8:57:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
It seems to me that Marnie may be confusing media with product - or at
least she's confusing ~me~. Photography, paint, charcoal and stencils
are merely media that may or may not produce art. Taki
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Bob W wrote:
>
>> > Basically. But with an artistic look
>> (painting/pastel/charcoal/stencil)
>> > rather than photographic or illustration look.
>>
>> Oh dear.
>>
>> I don't want to go down that road...
>>
>> ;-)
>>
>> cheers,
>> frank
>>
>
> Go on, Frank! It's
In a message dated 3/31/2009 2:59:10 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
p...@web-options.com writes:
> > Basically. But with an artistic look
> (painting/pastel/charcoal/stencil)
> > rather than photographic or illustration look.
>
> Oh dear.
>
> I don't want to go down that road...
>
> ;-)
>
> > Basically. But with an artistic look
> (painting/pastel/charcoal/stencil)
> > rather than photographic or illustration look.
>
> Oh dear.
>
> I don't want to go down that road...
>
> ;-)
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
Go on, Frank! It's one small step for a man...
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:21 PM, wrote:
> In a message dated 3/31/2009 2:20:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
> So, basically, it would mean "manipulated in such a way as to produce
> an image that you desire".
>
> Thanks!
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> =
> Bas
In a message dated 3/31/2009 2:20:13 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
So, basically, it would mean "manipulated in such a way as to produce
an image that you desire".
Thanks!
cheers,
frank
=
Basically. But with an artistic look (painting/pastel/charcoal/s
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 4:43 PM, wrote:
> I resisted asking yesterday, and I know I may regret asking, but what
> exactly does "artify" mean?
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> ===
> Not a straight photo. Not rendered like Godfrey does either. Basically, so
> far, I've used mainly t
In a message dated 3/31/2009 2:00:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
pentax...@mac.com writes:
Or, as our late scholarly president, the Bushwhacker would say, the
"artification" of an image, or a battlefield
===
Hmmm, if I sound like him, maybe I better come up with another word. ;
Or, as our late scholarly president, the Bushwhacker would say, the
"artification" of an image, or a battlefield
On Mar 31, 2009, at 13:48 , Bruce Dayton wrote:
Why, to make it 'arty', of course. :)
--
Bruce
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 1:29:09 PM, you wrote:
ft> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at
In a message dated 3/31/2009 1:48:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
bkday...@daytonphoto.com writes:
Why, to make it 'arty', of course. :)
--
Bruce
=
Heheh.
You were a lot briefer than I was. Brevity is the soul of wit.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
-
Why, to make it 'arty', of course. :)
--
Bruce
Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 1:29:09 PM, you wrote:
ft> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, Manuel. I like to artify sometimes. ;-)
ft> I resisted asking yesterday, and I know I may regret asking, but what
ft> exactly does "art
In a message dated 3/31/2009 1:29:43 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM,wrote:
>
> Thanks, Manuel. I like to artify sometimes. ;-)
I resisted asking yesterday, and I know I may regret asking, but what
exactly does "artify" mean?
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:58 PM, wrote:
>
> Thanks, Manuel. I like to artify sometimes. ;-)
I resisted asking yesterday, and I know I may regret asking, but what
exactly does "artify" mean?
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 3/31/2009 12:20:35 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
mfcmagalh...@netcabo.pt writes:
I like the artified.
Best regards,
Manuel
==
Thanks, Manuel. I like to artify sometimes. ;-)
Marnie aka Doe
-
Warning: I am now filter
I like the artified.
Best regards,
Manuel
On 09/03/30 21:52, "eactiv...@aol.com" wrote:
> As stated previously, when I shot Cherry Blossoms last week it was too sunny
> and too windy. Now my tree has very few blossoms left, they don't last long.
>
> Not a great or even that good a shot, bu
In a message dated 3/30/2009 7:49:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
cagu...@earthlink.net writes:
Very pretty, Marnie. I like them both. Cheers, Christine
===
Thanks, Christine.
Marnie aka Doe
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:52 PM
Subject: P
Very pretty, Marnie. I like them both. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:52 PM
Subject: PESO - Cherry Blossom Exuberance
As stated previously, when I shot Cherry Blossoms last week it was too
sunny
and too windy. Now my tree has ver
In a message dated 3/30/2009 2:43:40 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
knarftheria...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
> As stated previously, when I shot Cherry Blossoms last week it was too
sunny
> and too windy. Now my tree has very few blossoms left, they don't last
In a message dated 3/30/2009 3:17:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jdavi...@yahoo.com writes:
I, also, prefer the artified version. Beautiful rendering.
Very, very nice image, Marnie!
Jack
===
Thanks, Jack!
Sometimes artifying improves a photo, i.e. it makes a better graphic than a
photo.
I, also, prefer the artified version. Beautiful rendering.
Very, very nice image, Marnie!
Jack
--- On Mon, 3/30/09, eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
> From: eactiv...@aol.com
> Subject: PESO - Cherry Blossom Exuberance
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Date: Monday, March 30, 2009, 1:52 PM
> As stated previousl
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 4:52 PM, wrote:
> As stated previously, when I shot Cherry Blossoms last week it was too sunny
> and too windy. Now my tree has very few blossoms left, they don't last long.
>
> Not a great or even that good a shot, but it shows how pretty my tree was in
> flower.
>
> (
21 matches
Mail list logo
