Re: RE: Re: Portra 400UC
Dave wrote: << Because the parent lab can now proccess B&W film,he is
stocking Tmax 100/400 film.At least i don't have to drive 45 min to pick B&W
film
up now. >>
Wow!
Every now and again I'm reminded of my age. When I was first shoo
I would shoot at 250. That's going to give you a margin of error. I
think that even 200 would be okay for flowers, which might benefit from
a bit of extra contrast. Most films seem to be rated high, even the
transparency stocks.
Paul
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> So, I dropped of the roll for processing thinking I'd have a great
> demonstration. Between the exposure latitude of 400UC and
> the magic of the
> Fuji Frontier, I had 10 "acceptable" shots and two fairly
> ba
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED], on the subject of Portra 400UC mentioned his first
roll showed surprisingly good skin tones, and about 1/3 or the shots were
underexposed.
I'm glad to hear the skin tones are good. My first couple of rolls of people
shots come back from the la
I shot my first roll of Portra UC a few days ago. I metered it at 320,
and since I was shooting some snow scenes, I used an incident meter. The
exposures are nice. I had just finished a roll of Plus-X, so my meter
was set at 100 when I began. I forgot to change it before the first shot
and overexpo
5 matches
Mail list logo
