time, constant refrain that Pentax jpeg's were too soft.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce
Walker
Sent: Monday, 18 June 2012 9:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Question About
Sent: Monday, 18 June 2012 9:45 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Question About *ist D
Not a given at all, John.
From all I've read folks generally expect JPEG shots to be basically cooked
and ready to serve. A smaller percentage of JPEG shooters will crop and maybe
do some
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 11:27:45AM -0600, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I am about to sell my long-unused *ist D to a colleague, for whom it
is all the camera she needs. She will probably shoot JPEGs. I always
use PEF, and recall that *ist D JPEGs were criticized for being soft
and lacking contrast. I
I use the middle settings for saturation, sharpness and contrast, and have
never had an
issue with the jpeg's. In processing, I find that using Unsharp Mask at
50-70%, radius 1
and threshold 0 works well for prints up to A4 (the biggest I've gone with
digital
uncropped).
I don't know why
Not a given at all, John.
From all I've read folks generally expect JPEG shots to be basically
cooked and ready to serve. A smaller percentage of JPEG shooters will
crop and maybe do some basic exposure tweaks, but the majority of JPEG
adherents expect the camera to have done everything, like
I only had troble with my 16-45 lens for softness, all others did
quite well, and i did +1 on the incamera sharpness.
Dave
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Joseph Tainter jtain...@mindspring.com wrote:
I am about to sell my long-unused *ist D to a colleague, for whom it is all
the camera she
Probably for the same reason they,d discard a slide that missed the mark
exposure wise !
-Original Message-
From: John Coyle jco...@iinet.net.au
Sent: Jun 18, 2012 4:09 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Question About *ist D
I use the middle settings
Pentax Customer Service should be able to provide this as a spare part.
Godfrey
On Jul 8, 2005, at 10:23 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Does anyone know if the battery holder for the ist-D grip is available
separately? It would be very convenient to be able to have this clip
loaded with 4 freshly
Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now
and have not done any normal photography. I have a question for
the '*ist D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I put it on a microscope, in place of a
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now and
have not done any normal photography. I have a question for the '*ist
D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I put it on a microscope, in place of a Pentax film
body, will it take pictures
Thanks Dave,
Now all I have to do is find the money.
Don
David Wheatley wrote:
I've been concentrating of microscopy for a couple of years now and
have not done any normal photography. I have a question for the '*ist
D' experts. Will the camera work without a lens attached?
In other words if I
It will work.
You msut have firmware 1.1 installed and the cameraset to F-stop other
than A. Use green button to meter/determine esposure.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt:
12 matches
Mail list logo
