Larry, I printed A3's from both my *istD and K10D and never had a
problem with resolution. In my office I have a picture (which is a
square crop of K10D's frame) that is printed on canvas having 40cm or
so (I will check in a week, when I am back in) on the side and it
looks fantastic.
I should
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly impacted
the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather than
something else was the key factor?
--
Larry Colen
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather
than something
On Sep 23, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you
I notice it when I go to 1:1 view in LR. I see much more camera blur
with my K-5 than I ever did with my K100D Super, and nothing changed
in my technique between cameras.
I also notice it in file sizes. 25MB is much heavier on my computer
and memory cards than 10MB was.
Realistically, since 99
On 9/23/2012 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly impacted
the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather than
something else was the key factor?
It’s a big deal for me, but that’s because I’m impatient and have a
short attention span and often fail to take enough time to compose
properly. So I have to do a lot of cropping. Thus, more pixels are a
win. -T
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
In real
I enjoy taking photos of brambles and woods, and these combine a low
magnification level with lots of detail. The differences in resolution
between sensors, and between MF film and sensors, is quite apparent even
in small prints. The lower the resolution, the more the details merge
together.
with the 6MP istDS, when using sharp lenses, I get pixelation
of diagonals at high magnifications. More MP would alleviate this
situation.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
10 matches
Mail list logo
