So we will see what happens!
I think Pentax knows that many users sticks to them since they have great
compatibility. But not many people start with Pentax since they have no silent and
ultra fast quit cheap motors and plenty of gear not mentioning that sale assistants
usual advise new buyers
Two thinks i like about the D1 even with the 80-200 f2.8 on it,is its
well balanced even with the weight.The Pentax DSLR would have to ,for
me,be aswell.
Also the shutterlag is that of an slr,meaning its good for
capturing high speed sports with out panning(not to say panning is
badg)
Just not
: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RE: Hypothetical Question
Two thinks i like about the D1 even with the 80-200 f2.8 on it,is its
well balanced even with the weight.The Pentax DSLR would have to ,for
me,be aswell.
Also the shutterlag is that of an slr,meaning
On 18 Dec 2002 at 16:27, David Brooks wrote:
Just not sure how the CMOS works vs the CCD.I always associated CMOS
as start up computer programing.I have seen the Canon 1D and it looks
nice and its cheaper than the Dxx series from Nikon.
Any CMOS commentsCotty?
CMOS is a far better
Just not sure how the CMOS works vs the CCD.I always associated CMOS
as start up computer programing.I have seen the Canon 1D and it looks
nice and its cheaper than the Dxx series from Nikon.
Any CMOS commentsCotty?
From what I gather, the CMOS uses vastly less power than a comparable
CCD.
Glen wrote:
For a very impressive review including image comparisons of the EOS D1s and
35mm and 645 (buy the way he uses the Pentax 645) see this page below.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/1ds/1ds-field.shtml
He isn't. He is comparing his digital camera with another
6 matches
Mail list logo