Having become a proud papa of his first 35mm film/slide scanner, I can say that the ability to scan and print is impressive. I'm limited, unfortunately, to my Epson 870 right now so I only muster 8x10 out of a 2820dpi scan.
I'm sure the images could probably go as big as 11x14 (I think 20x30 would be pushing it without interpolation from Genuine Fractals) but I'm hesitant to try (as I'd have to either take a trip out to Aaron's place or buy a 1280). I have to agree though that, while being an owner of a digital camera (Canon G1) and having used digitals since 97 (Kodak DC120, Canon S10), I love the marriage that we're seeing between the film and digital world. It opens up and offers unlimited possibilities to any photographer. It was, after all, the digital cameras (although not DSLRs) that brought me back to using film and taking photographs with my father's Pentax SL, and eventually my own K1000. Cheers, Dave Original Message: ----------------- From: Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 08:24:53 -0500 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OT: 35mm chromes still beat digital <snip> A bunch of stuff that Aaron wrote:</snip> -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
