On 28 Dec 2001 at 20:36, Pål Jensen wrote:
> I'm sure film cameras that can do 5fps and more will be seen as pointless in the
> future. High speed photography will be the area of digital in the very near
> future. Wasting a roll in 3,6 seconds doesn't seem cost effective to me; not to
> mention t
Kent wrote:
> Pentax is sort of like Minolta in that respect. Only Canon and Nikon fight
> for the rarified area of 7+ FPS because they have to compete against each
> other.
I'm sure film cameras that can do 5fps and more will be seen as pointless in the
future. High speed photography will be
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pål Jensen
Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2001 3:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Speaking of films transport speed, was Re: I love the PZ-1p
Bill wrote:
> What happened to make film t
Bill wrote:
> What happened to make film transport speed so important? Didn't sports
> photogs learn how to use their equipment and get great shots in the days
> before high speed motordrives? When I was shooting for our college yearbook
> back in 1962-63, I used a rangefinder 35 and a Speed G
4 matches
Mail list logo
