RE: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-04 Thread Jan van Wijk
o: "pentax-discuss@pdml.net" >Subject: RE: Survey D and DS result > >I guess we've reached: >26 *ist D's >and >6 *ist DS'es >at this point. -- Jan van Wijk; http://www.dfsee.com/gallery

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-03 Thread Billy Abbott
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 21:08:56 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quoting Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > On 2 Feb 2005 at 0:05, John Forbes wrote: > > > > > Surprised the total isn't higher, and surprised the DS is already at 20% > > > > > of the D. > > > > Don't be, I su

RE: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-02 Thread Nick Clark
Oh alright then, I've got a D. Nick. -Original Message- From: "Jens Bladt"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: 02/02/05 20:05:11 To: "pentax-discuss@pdml.net" Subject: RE: Survey D and DS result I guess we've reached: 26 *ist D'

RE: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-02 Thread Jens Bladt
I guess we've reached: 26 *ist D's and 6 *ist DS'es at this point. Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 1. februar 2005 17:55 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Survey D and DS result

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-02 Thread ernreed2
Quoting wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: (regarding her *istD) > Then I go and use it some more and > think how nice it is, so I stand my ground because now > I'm not sure I want to sell it any more. Seriously, perhaps you should keep it now that you've found you feel that way. I'm not saying t

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-02 Thread wendy beard
--- Fred Widall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The totals do seem quite low - who's being shy about > their (digital) > equipment - shyness is not something I expect to see > around here > My *istD probably hasn't been counted because I only said I had it in a different thread :-) I didn't repl

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Holger Stephan
Another *ist Ds. Shy not, but you people keep yacking there is no catching up. :) Holger in Portland, OR Fred Widall wrote: The totals do seem quite low - who's being shy about their (digital) equipment - shyness is not something I expect to see around here This lead me to wonder how many people

RE: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Jens Bladt
Did you count each one twice, Herb? Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 2. februar 2005 01:40 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Survey D and DS result not everyone responded

re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Jens Bladt
-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Survey D and DS result In a message dated 2/1/2005 4:31:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the mailing list archive does list the number of messages posted each month. From those numbers here are the yearly totals 2001 33690 - 92 per

RE: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Jens Bladt
ng like the Zoom70 or Espio738). Jens Bladt mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sendt: 2. februar 2005 02:15 Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Emne: Re: Survey D and DS result On 2 Feb 2005 at 0:05,

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Survey D and DS result In a message dated 2/1/2005 4:31:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the mailing list archive does list the number of messages posted each month. From those number

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 2/1/2005 4:31:24 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I found that the mailing list archive does list the number of messages posted each month. From those numbers here are the yearly totals 2001 33690 - 92 per day 2002 37448 - 102 per day 2003 34807 - 95 per day

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread ernreed2
Quoting Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2 Feb 2005 at 0:05, John Forbes wrote: > > > Surprised the total isn't higher, and surprised the DS is already at 20% > > > of the D. > > Don't be, I suspect it's far from a total assessment, I recall some time > ago > there was a count of *ist D

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Herb Chong
not everyone responded, like me. i know when Jostein surveyed around the summertime, there were over 60 *istD owners on the list. Herb - Original Message - From: "John Forbes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 7:05 PM Subject: Re: Survey

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Fred Widall
The totals do seem quite low - who's being shy about their (digital) equipment - shyness is not something I expect to see around here This lead me to wonder how many people are subscribed to this list. Anyone have the answer ?? I found that the mailing list archive does list the number of messag

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread Rob Studdert
On 2 Feb 2005 at 0:05, John Forbes wrote: > Surprised the total isn't higher, and surprised the DS is already at 20% > of the D. Don't be, I suspect it's far from a total assessment, I recall some time ago there was a count of *ist D owners which neared or exceeded 50 units. Rob Studdert HUR

Re: Survey D and DS result

2005-02-01 Thread John Forbes
Surprised the total isn't higher, and surprised the DS is already at 20% of the D. John On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:55:15 +0100, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The result of my little survey is: Pentax *ist D represented on this list: 25 Pentax *ist DS represented on this list: 5 All the bes