e: Re: Take a wild guess
Thanks, I'll keep all that in mind when I start using my Epson
Perfection 3170...
keith whaley
Brian Walters wrote:
> Keith
>
> As I said, I didn't really buy it for its film scanning capabilities and I
didn't
> expect it to be able to comp
than the Minolta Dilmage 5700 - when or before (?) *ist
D is ancient history.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: David Miers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 22:26
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Take a wild guess
I
lm. I was surprised there was
little improvement in the 2400dpi scan over the 1600 in the epson?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Take a wild guess
Thanks for the input, Dave. I woul
MAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 17:43
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Take a wild guess
..PS about processing.
No processing - except of course for scaling.
The scanned photograph is however, a more subjective matter, since the
scanner will interpret the colours and exposure according to t
t
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: alex wetmore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 17:34
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Take a wild guess
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Thanks for you reactions, all.
> You are of
Except it's containing the (cheep) batteries.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 17:38
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Take a wild guess
On Tue, 25 May
CTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Brian Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 01:47
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Take a wild guess
Hi Jens
Well - eyerone else seems to think that the p4681284.html is the digital and
who
am I to disagree?
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
> I'm not sure what you mean(?)
> IMO the MZ-S photograph might as well have been taken with my K1000. Under
> these conditions (the bikes and me was not moving, the light conditions were
> not changing fast) the photographs would have been identical, althoug
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
> Thanks for you reactions, all.
> You are of cource all right. DOF, colour cast, and frame format gave it
> away.
> The first one is from a Sony, the second from a Pentax.
> The correct exposure values are
> Sony: f6.3, 1/1250 sec
> Pentax: f8, 1/750
film
scanner - or perhaps a digital camera instead.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Brian Walters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 01:47
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Take a wild guess
Hi Jens
Well - e
c. or f8 and 1/500 sec. In paractice no
siginificanvt difference.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 25. maj 2004 07:46
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: Take a wild guess
It would be interesting to see the difference between the Sony and a $10
disposable camera.
--
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
not a fair comparison because you could have got same
quality "analog" with a $200 K-1000.
--
graywolf
http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html
Hi Jens
Well - eyerone else seems to think that the p4681284.html is the digital and who
am I to disagree? The second photo doesn't seem to have the same amount of
definition as the first which suggests it's been subject to more processing.
Out of curiousity, what's your opinion of the Epson for
I believe it is. My MZ-S and PZ-1 says 6.7!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. maj 2004 22:51
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Take a wild guess
Perhaps it is how it rounds
(between 5.6
and 8) according to my PZ-1 LCD.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Antonio Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. maj 2004 19:27
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Take a wild guess
Also, the 50/1.4 does have an
Aparicio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 24. maj 2004 19:27
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Take a wild guess
Also, the 50/1.4 does have an f stop at 6.7, but rather 6.6. ;-)
A.
On 24 May 2004, at 19:18, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
> Just looking at the bokeh I would say pic 2 is the pentax 5
oops, that should be does NOT have and f stop
On 24 May 2004, at 19:26, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Also, the 50/1.4 does have an f stop at 6.7, but rather 6.6. ;-)
A.
On 24 May 2004, at 19:18, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Just looking at the bokeh I would say pic 2 is the pentax 50mm 1.4
A.
On 24 May
Also, the 50/1.4 does have an f stop at 6.7, but rather 6.6. ;-)
A.
On 24 May 2004, at 19:18, Antonio Aparicio wrote:
Just looking at the bokeh I would say pic 2 is the pentax 50mm 1.4
A.
On 24 May 2004, at 18:44, Jens Bladt wrote:
I took the same photograph twice:
One of the photographs was shot w
Just looking at the bokeh I would say pic 2 is the pentax 50mm 1.4
A.
On 24 May 2004, at 18:44, Jens Bladt wrote:
I took the same photograph twice:
One of the photographs was shot with Pentax MZ-S and SMC FA 1.4/50mm
on 200
ASA Fuji Superia, scanned on EPSON PERFECTION 3200 PHOTO. The other
was s
If they are both uncropped, the format ratio gives it away. The ...284 image
being from the Sony, the ...285 from film.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 6:44 PM
Subject: Take a wild guess
> I took th
On Mon, 24 May 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
> I took the same photograph twice:
> One of the photographs was shot with Pentax MZ-S and SMC FA 1.4/50mm on 200
> ASA Fuji Superia, scanned on EPSON PERFECTION 3200 PHOTO. The other was shot
> with SONY DSC F717 at 200 ASA.
>
> Which one was made with a PENT
21 matches
Mail list logo
