t; Don
>
> ___
> Dr E D F Williams
> http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
> Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
> Updated: March 30, 2002
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> S
On 28 Mar 2003 at 16:10, Geir Aalberg wrote:
> Interesting. Does this mean that if one use it in a camera with one of
> these film pressure plates with "bumps", you're likely to see reflections
> of the bumps on the prints? (I was told in darkroom class this was the main
> point of anti-halation
At 09:50 2003-03-28 -0500, tom wrote:
The 2nd reason HIE must be handled in the dark is the lack of
anti-halation coating.
Interesting. Does this mean that if one use it in a camera with one of
these film pressure plates with "bumps", you're likely to see reflections
of the bumps on the prints?
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Dr E D F Williams"
> Subject: Re: Technical Pan OT
>
> Kodak atr one time said that HIE should be loaded and
> unloaded in complete
> da
- Original Message -
From: "Dr E D F Williams"
Subject: Re: Technical Pan OT
Kodak atr one time said that HIE should be loaded and unloaded in complete
darkness, sisnce the felt lips were not IR safe, but that is a really
special case film.
Tech Pan, while unique, doesn&
The instructor forund some 10 year old Kodak Technidol which he used way back when
he shot this film. We mixed it at 24 degrees c and developed for 5 min.I only had time
in
class to
do a quick test strip and print,but it sure looked nice.Farley good contrast and not
much
grain.
Dave
PS thanks
>
Are you under the impression that the film, in
> its cassette, might have been fogged by subdued light in the bathroom?
I was,but i developed in class last night with some technidol he had.One pack to 8 oz
of
water. I rated it at 50(apparently it can be
This post is difficult to understand. Do you mean you put the cassette into
the camera in the bathroom? Are you under the impression that the film, in
its cassette, might have been fogged by subdued light in the bathroom?
You write 'The info on Kodak's website suggests to load and unload in
comple
I had a client years ago who shot Tech Pan for fashion stuff. The extended
red sensitivity was good for the girl's complaxions.
We came up with a speed of 12, and IIRC, I used HC:110, Dilution D for (I
think) around 6 minutes. You can only load half the film the tank will
carry, to ensure you have
What are you planning to use for a developer? The E.I with tech pan
developer is usually 25. I think there are a couple developers that will
give you a full range negative at E.I. 50. I think you can even use HC-110
with dilution F (very weak).
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to fi
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 18:41:15 -0500
Nick Zentena <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 25, 2003 05:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Any thoughts or comments before i possible waste some developing
> > time. BTW it's rated it at 50 with just a standard uv filter for
> > the test.
>
>
>
On March 25, 2003 05:08 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Any thoughts or comments before i possible waste some developing time.
> BTW it's rated it at 50 with just a standard uv filter for the test.
I forget but isn't that way too fast for Techpan?
Nick
Tech Pan can be a bear to work with. The nature of the film base makes
it tougher to get onto a steel reel and easier to scratch. Results in
Technidol developer are astounding, but Technidol is comparitively
dangerous, so you probably don't want to use it too often. I recall,
from the packaging
Treena Harp inquired regarding Kodak Tech Pan 2415:
> What is the best use for this film, and in what should it be
> processed for best results?
Hi Treena,
For one thing, this is a favored emulsion of professional astronomical
observatories -- extremely fine grain. Also used by amateurs doing B
From: Treena Harp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I picked up a couple of rolls of Kodak Tech Pan in 120. Most of my B+W
experience is with TMax and Tri-X. What is the best use for this film, and
in what should it be processed for best results?
I would advise against a high contrast subject. Also, I've ha
15 matches
Mail list logo
