From: Jack Davis
Going through another period of non returning posts. ???
If you don't receive this, let me know. OK?
Jack
Ok.
-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3658 - Release Date: 05/24/11
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thanks, Matt! ;)
Jack
--- On Wed, 5/25/11, Matthew Hunt wrote:
> From: Matthew Hunt
> Subject: Re: Test.
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 11:22 AM
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jack
> Davis
> wrote:
>
> > Going
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Going through another period of non returning posts. ???
> If you don't receive this, let me know. OK?
I didn't not receive it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
We suffered an extremely windy day yesterday and lost power for awhile.
So, yes...electronically speaking.
Jack :/
--- On Tue, 5/17/11, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
> Subject: Re: TEST-Ignore
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 8:36
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: TEST-Ignore
After I wrote and sent the 'please' response, I realized that I hadn't
been that courteous, but wanted to wait 'til I was
After I wrote and sent the 'please' response, I realized that I hadn't been
that courteous, but wanted to wait 'til I was again receiving posts before
making that correction.
I'm now back!
Jack ;)
--- On Tue, 5/17/11, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
>
Not that it matters, but the 'please' didn't appear on your original email -
I still would have ignored it !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: TEST-Ignore
Ken I'll
Ken I'll try to ignore your ignoring my "ignore." I did say "please!" ;)
Jack
--- On Tue, 5/17/11, Ken Waller wrote:
> From: Ken Waller
> Subject: Re: TEST-Ignore
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 1:38 PM
&g
Try the POST office.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: TEST-Ignore
Am missing some posts.
Jack
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRI
I failed.
--
MaritimTim
My private photo blog: http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
My photo class blog: http://z-fotokurs.blogspot.com/
To err is human
to arr is pirate
--
On 11-04-28 10:30 PM, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 April 2011 12:14, Paul Stenquist wrote:
test
I'm getting pdml mail now at this gmail address. But I still can't seem to post.
Hi Paul,
All's well however when posting via gmail you won't see your post
until someone replies, it's just one of tho
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:30 +1000, "Rob Studdert"
wrote:
> On 29 April 2011 12:14, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > test
> >
> > I'm getting pdml mail now at this gmail address. But I still can't seem to
> > post.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> All's well however when posting via gmail you won't see your post
> unti
On 29 April 2011 12:14, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> test
>
> I'm getting pdml mail now at this gmail address. But I still can't seem to
> post.
Hi Paul,
All's well however when posting via gmail you won't see your post
until someone replies, it's just one of those things, there are ways
around it b
Chris Mitchell wrote:
"Impressive disclaimer..."
Yeah that's why I opened a Yahoo account. There's no way to delete the
disclaimer on my main account.
k
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please vi
Impressive disclaimer...
On 27 April 2011 23:06, W Keith2 Mosier wrote:
> This is just a test. I've had difficulty posting to the list every time I
> have tried.
>
>
> This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
> information that may be Privileged, confidential or copyr
I see your test message! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Keith Mosier"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 5:20 PM
Subject: test message
This is just a test. I've had difficulty posting to the list every time I
have
tried.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PD
Don't know about the digest(s) but the list has seemed wonky for the last few
days with several persons reporting difficulty sending and/or receiving
messages. Do Digests get generated based on Time (i.e., every so often) or on
Volume (i.e., every x messages)? There may not have been enough traf
Tim to move on then =)
2011/3/11 Tim Øsleby :
> I had a brief moment of panic. It's over now.
>
> --
> MaritimTim
>
> http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> 2011/3/11 eckinator :
>> oh please use a snoot, willya?
>>
>> 2011/3/11 Tim Øsleby :
>>> MaritimTim
>>>
>>> http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
I had a brief moment of panic. It's over now.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2011/3/11 eckinator :
> oh please use a snoot, willya?
>
> 2011/3/11 Tim Øsleby :
>> MaritimTim
>>
>> http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http:/
oh please use a snoot, willya?
2011/3/11 Tim Øsleby :
> MaritimTim
>
> http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> the dire
Remind me to remind you of Nostradamus next time you post on the list
that this or that does not work for you, Steve /evil wink/.
On 2/7/2011 2:52 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Of course, I read on Pentax forums that these stains were predicted by
Nostradamus. ;-)
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:09 A
Of course, I read on Pentax forums that these stains were predicted by
Nostradamus. ;-)
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Roman, if I am not mistaken I read somewhere (most likely Pentax Forums)
> that sometimes the sensor stains do not show immediately after you get a
> ca
Roman, if I am not mistaken I read somewhere (most likely Pentax Forums)
that sometimes the sensor stains do not show immediately after you get a
camera. They may appear few weeks (so many shutter clicks) later. So
perhaps you might want to repeat your test in a few weeks just to be
completely
Very nice image!
Dan
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
> https://picasaweb.google.com/romancos/Test#5569799441698684482
>
> ^^^ finally got my K-5 and quite satisfied. First off I'd tested dust
> tracks in the middle of the sensor and it appeared to be clean. Thank 4
> clean
On Feb 4, 2011, at 3:50 AM, Roman Melihhov wrote:
> https://picasaweb.google.com/romancos/Test#5569799441698684482
>
> ^^^ finally got my K-5 and quite satisfied. First off I'd tested dust
> tracks in the middle of the sensor and it appeared to be clean. Thank 4
> clean sensor. Second I made few
I've had it for over a year but thus far I've rarely shot flat
subjects wide open and I'm not much of a pixel peeper so it may well
have escaped me until now. I'll go for the wall then. The idea was to
have something to show to Pentax when I drive over there.
Ecke
2010/11/29 paul stenquist :
> For
For a flat focus test all you need is a textured wall, a tripod and a level.
Just make sure the camera is parallel to the wall and the lens is perpendicular
to the wall. Then shoot wide open. It was easy to spot the focus error on my
first 16-50. But this is an assembly problem that generally sh
The answering machine is sick. You're talking with the refrigerator...
On 11/17/2010 6:36 AM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
test
--
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Only pseudo? I would have thought at least artificial.
On 11/16/2010 11:56 PM, CheekyGeek wrote:
This concludes this test of the emergency mobile phone post system.
Had this been an actual post, it would have contained photos, opinion,
or something resembling a reasonable facsimile of what pass
This concludes this test of the emergency mobile phone post system.
Had this been an actual post, it would have contained photos, opinion,
or something resembling a reasonable facsimile of what passes today
for pseudo-intelligence.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net
wrote:
Quiz.
--Original Message--
From: cagu...@earthlink.net
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: pdml@pdml.net
To: cagu...@earthlink.net
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: test
Sent: Nov 16, 2010 11:36 PM
test
--
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Sorry, your test message was not received.
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net
wrote:
> test
>
> --
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Congratulations now you can no longer escape the PDML.
On 11/16/2010 11:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
test
--
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy."
-Woody Allen
--
PD
Success!
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/waltergilbert
http://waltgilbert.posterous.com/
On 11/16/2010 10:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
test
--
Sent from my Verizon Wireless mobile phone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 1:21 AM, Chris Mitchell
wrote:
> Norton Anti spam switched off.
>
>
You didn't post in a form of question. Fail.
--
http://www.mountainfort.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Chris Mitchell
wrote:
> Norton Anti spam switched off.
Norton, spam, norton, Mcafee, spam, AVG does not have much spam in it.
Dave
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from th
Looks off to me.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:21 AM, Chris Mitchell
wrote:
> Norton Anti spam switched off.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
> t
You got through, obviously you're doing something wrong.
On 11/11/2010 3:21 AM, Chris Mitchell wrote:
Norton Anti spam switched off.
--
"His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy."
-Woody Allen
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
that's the name of a Billy Bunter character, almost! Hari Jamset Ram Singh,
the nabob of Janipur. He spoke a beautiful old-fashioned English which I was
surprised to learn when I first started working with Indian Indians is still
current!
>
> Ramjet, ramjet
> Dave
>
> On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SIbFJmCUxsA
From: David J Brooks
Ramjet, ramjet
Dave
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
> is in order
>
> -Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
Have you got the clearance, Clarence. ;-D
From: Boris Liberman
Roger roger...
On 10/24/2010 3:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
> is in order
>
> -Adam
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
From: Adam Maas
Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
is in order
-Adam
I subscribe through the digests. It's in PDML Digest, Vol 54, Issue 236.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from t
What's your vector, Victor?
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Roger roger...
>
>
> On 10/24/2010 3:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
>>
>> Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
>> is in order
>>
>> -Adam
>>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> P
You have no idea what you're asking for.
--Original Message--
From: Adam Maas
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Test
Sent: Oct 24, 2010 9:09 AM
Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
is in
Ramjet, ramjet
Dave
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
> is in order
>
> -Adam
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Roger roger...
On 10/24/2010 3:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
Haven't been getting anything from the PDML since yesterday, so a test
is in order
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
On Sep 10, 2010, at 02:00 , Joseph McAllister wrote:
I fell in love with Milla Jovovich in "5th Element" and have been
waiting for this ResEvi release for a while. That and the Twilight /
Serenity crew to get back in front of the camera. And Terminator…
And Summer Glau in the new TV series,
On Sep 9, 2010, at 10:43 , Miserere wrote:
I watched it twice at the movie theaters (both in 3D) and loved it. I
didn't find it too long, and the visual beauty of it all far makes up
for the plot deficiencies. The music is great too.
Enjoy the film, Joe!
It was a treat! It didn't seem too lon
On 9 September 2010 13:23, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> The movie has great special effects, making it a "must-see," but the
> plot is woefully deficient, and the movie is far, far too long.
>
> Dan
I watched it twice at the movie theaters (both in 3D) and loved it. I
didn't find it too long, and t
The movie has great special effects, making it a "must-see," but the
plot is woefully deficient, and the movie is far, far too long.
Dan
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Joseph McAllister wrote:
> Might be all blue later today when I return from the 2 hr 51 min viewing of
> "Avatar, Special Editi
Might be all blue later today when I return from the 2 hr 51 min
viewing of "Avatar, Special Edition 3D". It's the last day of it
showing here. I've missed all previous dates. Know I won't be viewing
it on a Netflix DVD in 3D, so…
On Sep 9, 2010, at 02:25 , eckinator wrote:
so I'll be ca
so I'll be calling you "el corazon valiente" from now on? c'mon show
us yer blue stripes =)
2010/9/9 Joseph McAllister :
> On Sep 9, 2010, at 01:42 , eckinator wrote:
>
>> 2010/9/9 Joseph McAllister :
>>>
>>> No es Jose, es José, tonto!
>>
>> José MuckChhhallister?
>
> José el gran guerrero es
On Sep 9, 2010, at 01:42 , eckinator wrote:
2010/9/9 Joseph McAllister :
No es Jose, es José, tonto!
José MuckChhhallister?
José el gran guerrero escocés que estudió español durante años con la
señora Oñate en Cambridge, Massachusetts mientras asistía a la Escuela
Preparatoria de N
2010/9/9 Joseph McAllister :
>
> No es Jose, es José, tonto!
José MuckChhhallister?
Cheers
Ecke
-
Cameras don’t shoot people.
Photographers shoot people.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
On Sep 7, 2010, at 13:44 , Ken Waller wrote:
?> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, eckinator
wrote:
I can say you can send but can you receive?
Tis better to send than receive.
Yes but it remains a truly American question nonetheless:
Oh say, can you see?
No, No, No.
It's Jose can you see
> mike wilson wrote:
> I believe there's a setting at pdml.net on your personal (logged on)
> page that allows you to choose whether to see your own posts or not.
> Log in via the bottommost box on the page.
Thanks Mike, as long as I know they are getting through, I'll live without
receiving my o
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Oddly enough Darren, I used to receive my own messages. Makes no odds, it
works and that's good enough for me.
Malcolm
I believe there's a setting at pdml.net on your personal (logged on)
page that allows you to choose whether to see your own posts or not.
Log in via th
On 2010-09-07 08:10 , CheekyGeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until somebody
replies to it.
it's normal for abnormal Gmail; it's abnormal for normal email cli
On 9/7/2010 5:48 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:10 -0500, "CheekyGeek"
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until somebody
replies to it.
(At least tha
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 09:10 -0500, "CheekyGeek"
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith
> wrote:
> > Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
>
> That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until somebody
> replies to it.
> (At least that is the way it is for me, an
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "eckinator"
Subject: Re: Test
2010/9/7 CheekyGeek :
?> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
I can say you can send but can you receive?
Tis better to send than re
From: eckinator
2010/9/7 CheekyGeek :
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
>> I can say you can send but can you receive?
>
> Tis better to send than receive.
Yes but it remains a truly American question nonetheless:
Oh say, can you see?
Unless you slipped across the border w
Oddly enough Darren, I used to receive my own messages. Makes no odds, it
works and that's good enough for me.
Malcolm
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith
> wrote:
> > Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
>
> That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until so
On Sep 7, 2010, at 07:10 , CheekyGeek wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith
wrote:
Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until somebody
replies to it.
(At least that is the way it is for me, and I assume everybod
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Malcolm Smith wrote:
> Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
That's normal behavior. You don't see your own messages until somebody
replies to it.
(At least that is the way it is for me, and I assume everybody else).
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
Nothi
Yours, yes, but not my own post. Thanks Ecke.
Malcolm
> I can say you can send but can you receive?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
2010/9/7 CheekyGeek :
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
>> I can say you can send but can you receive?
>
> Tis better to send than receive.
Yes but it remains a truly American question nonetheless:
Oh say, can you see?
Cheers
Ecke
-
Camer
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 7:21 AM, eckinator wrote:
> I can say you can send but can you receive?
Tis better to send than receive.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pd
I can say you can send but can you receive?
2010/9/7 Malcolm Smith :
> Checking a new e-mail account.
>
> If it does work, I have to say that Frank's reindeer looked far happier to
> be back at school than my three yesterday. Great capture.
>
> Malcolm
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PD
haven't had one of those in a while. are you sure it worked?
2010/9/5 Christine Aguila :
> test
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
OK. State the Clausius definition of entropy.
--Original Message--
From: Christine Aguila
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
ReplyTo: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: test
Sent: Sep 5, 2010 1:11 PM
test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 5:17 AM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Just installed a new version of my virus scanner, and needed to update a few
> settings.
>
> Nothing to see here move along...
Ya right
Dave
>
> --
> {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0
> Courier New;}}
> \v
Send mail. Receive mail. Everything else is highly immoral.
2010/5/19 David Mann :
> I've migrated to a new server and I'm still thinking about what to do with my
> various email addresses.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
On 2010-03-08 19:07 , Steven Desjardins wrote:
Damn, I was afraid of that . . .
if you break through the fear, your messages will get through
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link direc
Anything to help.
On 3/8/2010 9:07 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Damn, I was afraid of that . . .
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:27 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
No.
On 3/7/2010 8:59 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Is this getting through?
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{
Damn, I was afraid of that . . .
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:27 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> No.
>
> On 3/7/2010 8:59 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>>
>> Is this getting through?
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0
> Courier New;}}
> \viewkind4\uc1\pard
No.
On 3/7/2010 8:59 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Is this getting through?
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just upgraded to Thunderbird 3.0 and the
interface subtly weird.\par
}
--
PDML Pentax-Di
I saw Steve and Ann's but didn't see yours.
On Mar 8, 2010, at 3:11 AM, eckinator wrote:
didn't even see ann's mail - must be contagious
cheers
ecke
2010/3/8 ann sanfedele :
nah
never saw it
ann
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Is this getting through?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@
didn't even see ann's mail - must be contagious
cheers
ecke
2010/3/8 ann sanfedele :
> nah
> never saw it
>
> ann
>
> Steven Desjardins wrote:
>
>> Is this getting through?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML
nah
never saw it
ann
Steven Desjardins wrote:
Is this getting through?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Read you loud & clear on the list. Also cc'd to your e-mail.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> Is this getting through?
>
> --
> Steve Desjardins
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Well, OK. I'm very sensitive, thus concede that you "win."
Jack
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, William Robb wrote:
> From: William Robb
> Subject: Re: test
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Sunday, January 31, 2010, 4:29 PM
>
> - Original Mes
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: test
Since it's now working, you'll win the considerable benefit of my
critiques of your future postings. How 'bout that?
Feel lucky?
;-))
HAR!!
Are you thinking you can out critique me?
Willia
Since it's now working, you'll win the considerable benefit of my critiques of
your future postings. How 'bout that?
Feel lucky?
;-))
Jack
--- On Sun, 1/31/10, William Robb wrote:
> From: William Robb
> Subject: Re: test
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
&
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Sent: Sunday, January 31, 2010 6:22 PM
Subject: test
Do I win something for passing?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the li
On November 12th at 2:00
Dave
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> test
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
In a message dated 11/10/2009 7:19:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
webstertwenty...@gmail.com writes:
test
=
I wish I had a wise crack equal of yours.
Like the ones you toss out for others' tests.
But, sadly, I don't
Marnie :-(
-
We ca
failed miserably =P
2009/11/11 P. J. Alling :
> test
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
Looks good.
I have the Nikon version and am happy with it.
It does some nice vignetting when put on the 90X.
Dave
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 11:38 PM, <27...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Have not been on for a while, but lately a little lurking.
> Here is a couple of photos taken with the Simga lens. On
- Original Message -
From: <27...@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: Test photos with the new Simga 10mm - 20mm F3.5 HSM lens
Yes, about 150lbs,Joe
The people we got our Terv from were having some issues with coyotes taking
out livestock on their farm.
They got a pair of Pyrs a
Yes, about 150lbs,Joe
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2009 7:12:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: Test photos with the new Simga 10mm - 20mm F3.5 HSM lens
- Original Mess
Thanks. I'm working towards purchasing this lens. It seems to be the
fastest, widest, rectilinear option for the Pentax mount. (I've been
waiting for the allegedly Pentax co-designed Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 to be
released as a DA, but it apparently is never going to happen.)
I don't understand why Pen
- Original Message -
From: <27...@comcast.net>
Subject: Test photos with the new Simga 10mm - 20mm F3.5 HSM lens
Have not been on for a while, but lately a little lurking.
Here is a couple of photos taken with the Simga lens. One was shot with
the K20d and the other with the K7. I
Bed? Rest? Really?
Help me support Autism research! Join my
team! http://www.walknowforautism.org/stlouis/blubiconsbuddies
http://stampmine.blogspot.com/http://samsphotopage.blogspot.com/
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, paul stenquist wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
> Subject: Re: Tes
Oh no. Theres always more more test.
Evan Hanson wrote:
One last test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:07 PM, Sandra Hermann wrote:
I got it!
Penicillin and bed rest are recommended.
Paul
Help me support Autism research! Join my team!
http://www.walknowforautism.org/stlouis/blubiconsbuddies
http://stampmine.blogspot.com/http://samsphotopage.blogspot.com/
--- On F
Finally I found the problem
Woot
Back on the list
Evan
On Oct 30, 2009, at 8:05 PM, Evan Hanson wrote:
One last test
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
and follow t
I got it!
Help me support Autism research! Join my
team! http://www.walknowforautism.org/stlouis/blubiconsbuddies
http://stampmine.blogspot.com/http://samsphotopage.blogspot.com/
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, Evan Hanson wrote:
> From: Evan Hanson
> Subject: Test
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Must keep control, must keep control
eactiv...@aol.com wrote:
Sent something to list twice and got returned by a mail daemon as spam.
When did I become spam?
Marnie
-
We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when w
In a message dated 10/11/2009 5:49:37 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
jehosep...@mindspring.com writes:
You are what you eat. Your past is finally catching up to you! :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
Heh. I have never eaten Spam in my life.
You've missed a treat then.
--
PDML
701 - 800 of 1562 matches
Mail list logo
