Re: This might bring a tear to your eye.

Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 2:30:03 AM, William wrote: WR This camera needed a bit more work than we could provide for it. WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops1.html WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops2.html WR Sorry for the poor quality, these were some of the first pictures I scanned. WR

Re: This might bring a tear to your eye.

Frantisek wrote: Tuesday, March 29, 2005, 2:30:03 AM, William wrote: WR This camera needed a bit more work than we could provide for it. WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops1.html WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops2.html WR Sorry for the poor quality, these were some of the first

Re: This might bring a tear to your eye.

- Original Message - From: Frantisek Subject: Re: This might bring a tear to your eye. Bill you are starting to repeat yourself ;-) You have posted these several years back (4? 5?). IIRC it's a Mamiya MF or Bronica MF camera? Used as an argument for Pentax MF ;-) I know, but Don wasn't

RE: This might bring a tear to your eye.

And actually it did help. ;-) Hmmm, maybe this one's not so bad after all. (The crazy man thinks to himself.) Don -Original Message- From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 6:19 AM To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: Re: This might bring a tear to

Re: This might bring a tear to your eye.

On 28/3/05, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: This camera needed a bit more work than we could provide for it. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops1.html http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops2.html Sorry for the poor quality, these were some of the first pictures I scanned. It's amazing

Re: This might bring a tear to your eye.

On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 18:30:03 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This camera needed a bit more work than we could provide for it. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops1.html http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/Oops2.html Sorry for the poor quality, these were some of the first pictures