I guess I'm being to obtuse.
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Well, no. Either they could ask me what to do with the previous image
> and then close it or they could save the current development settings
> and go to the next image. Either way, my CPU shouldn't choke.
>
> Boris
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
bject: Re: To you, Adobe LightRoom enthusiasts
Well, no. Either they could ask me what to do with the previous image
and then close it or they could save the current development settings
and go to the next image. Either way, my CPU shouldn't choke.
Boris
P. J. Alling wrote:
> The probl
Well, no. Either they could ask me what to do with the previous image
and then close it or they could save the current development settings
and go to the next image. Either way, my CPU shouldn't choke.
Boris
P. J. Alling wrote:
> The problem is obvious. You're trying to open more than one image
The problem is obvious. You're trying to open more than one image at a
time.
Boris Liberman wrote:
> I send my questions and concerns ;-).
>
> Folks, I've imported about 350 images to LR beta 4. This is all my K10D
> stuff that I shot so far. My PC at home is running Win XP (not 64 bit)
> and
Thibouille
Sent: 31. januar 2007 11:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: To you, Adobe LightRoom enthusiasts
This is interesting.
BTW one should *always* have 5 -10% free space on any disk drive. It
really helps performance (this comment is very general, not Lightroom
related).
2007/1
VERY interesting report, thanks Godfrey !
2007/1/31, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It's difficult to judge the performance of the v1.0 release version
> by running the v4.1 beta release. In addition, the Windows version in
> v4.1 beta isn't as well tuned as the Mac OS X version ... the l
It's difficult to judge the performance of the v1.0 release version
by running the v4.1 beta release. In addition, the Windows version in
v4.1 beta isn't as well tuned as the Mac OS X version ... the latter
had about a year's more development/optimization time when the
Windows version was r
Installing and reinstalling also helps. But not for long :-(
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: 31. januar 2007 11:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: To you, Adobe
I'm aware of the 5-10% rule. That's why I did it ;-)
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Thibouille
Sent: 31. januar 2007 11:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: To you, Adobe
This is interesting.
BTW one should *always* have 5 -10% free space on any disk drive. It
really helps performance (this comment is very general, not Lightroom
related).
2007/1/31, Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm afraid I can't provide you with a good answer.
> At first my Lightroom had acc
I'm afraid I can't provide you with a good answer.
At first my Lightroom had acceptable performance, but it has gradually been
slowing down. I don't think it is because of increased numbers of files
(that's what I experienced with RSP), because I haven't photographed much
lately. I have tweaked my
On 31.01.2007, at 09:26 , Peter Lacus wrote:
> Welcome to the world of Lightroom (beta), Boris. This is exactly the
> reason why Lightroom is NOT for me.
Exactly and that's one of the reasons I choosed Aperture over Lightroom.
Cheers,
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
> Folks, I've imported about 350 images to LR beta 4. This is all my K10D
> stuff that I shot so far. My PC at home is running Win XP (not 64 bit)
> and hardware is Athlon 64 at rated 2800+ with 1.5 GB RAM on board. Not
> the fastest, but not a slouch either.
>
> Now, if I have an image in the
Yes I can second that.
On my old PC (my laptop is modern but not hte other PC) which is
AthlonXP 2GHz, 768 RAM etc... Lightroom is VERY slow. To the point
that when it begins to rebuild its thumbnail database (every program
start.. don't ask me why it acts like that) my computer is simply
unusable.
I had similar experiences and from my reading on the boards, many
people have the same problems. I know that if I would load the
program and walk away for about 20 minutes, it would cache things and
I don't know what else, but would run at a reasonable speed after that
- not blazingly fast, but to
In a message dated 1/30/2007 9:35:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What is it I am doing wrong?
Boris
==
Listening to too much hype? ;-)
Seriously sometimes the first version of a new software product is not the
one to go with. Also it is possible they have
Mmm beta Lightroom is indeed slow in certain operations.
I really hope final version will be quite a bit faster.
IMO your PC is very OK. I would be VERY disapointed if your PC was to
be really slow running the final product. Now I don't have access to
final version of course so we'll see.
20
17 matches
Mail list logo
