On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Anthony Farr wrote:
> I've seen this kind of address on some spam e-mails, and I've read that
> they are sent directly into your mail reader while online, rather than
> being downloaded from your ISP's mail server. That's why they have the
> strange address details. Just wh
Shel wrote:
> That's a lot of work. Not using Outlook frees me, it seems,
> from having to deal with this garbage.
Not using WinDoze is even better. One of the benefits of
Macintosh's small market share is that these viro-nutz
don't bother attacking since the "big gor
Hi,
On 30 Nov 2001 at 10:04, Kent Gittings wrote:
> In my opinion at least Outlook tends to be more intuitive than using
> the Netscape email client.
But these are only two. Two of the most common ones,
and obviously the ones the viruses and worms are tested on.
Personally, I'm for Pegasus Ma
BTW an easy way to see if you have W32.Badtrans is to check for the
existence of Kernel32.exe (that's EXE and *NOT* DLL) and kdll.dll in your
windows system directory, as those arte the virus files. You can remove the
virus by deleteting them both in safe mode. Of course you also need to
delete th
I had to remove W32.Badtrans.B virus from a machine this week too. Norton
only added this definition a few days ago (24th I believe), so if you
haven't run liveupdate since then it wont pick it up. Once I installed the
latest update it removed the virus fine. You also need to check Windows
Update
That's a lot of work. Not using Outlook frees me, it seems, from having
to deal with this garbage.
Sorry you got infected, but, just out of curiosity, if various MS
products are so susceptible to this sort of thing, why use those
products? Is there some feature about Outlook that makes it mor
ls updated.
Kent Gittings
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Rittenhouse
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Viruses & Worms Everywhere
The one that got me was, I think, a script embedded in a
I've seen this kind of address on some spam e-mails, and I've read that
they are sent directly into your mail reader while online, rather than
being downloaded from your ISP's mail server. That's why they have the
strange address details. Just what I read but as I have no effing idea
how email w
I've not seen anything embedded in HTML, but, in all honesty, I'm not
sure what to look for. What I received were attachments sent, in part,
through mailing list messages.
The ones that came my way were blank messages, the sender of which had
an odd aspect to his/her email address. The addresse
IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:18 PM
Subject: Re: Viruses & Worms Everywhere
> Shel,
>
> Were they in attachments or embedded in HTML? I'd just like to know
> what to watch out for.
>
> Regards,
> Anthony Farr
>
> - Original Message --
blems other than the changed
MBR. In fact NAV seems to have triggered the virus. So be careful.
--graywolf
- Original Message -
From: aimcompute <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: Viruses & Worms Everywhere
Shel,
Were they in attachments or embedded in HTML? I'd just like to know
what to watch out for.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't know about you all, but in the last three days I've received
> eleven email messages that c
Norton hasn't detected any on my machine in that time frame. but I've seen
several posts on the Meade list by different people in the last several days
who were sent viruses.
Tom C.
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent
13 matches
Mail list logo
