t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2002 12:21 PM
Subject: Pics from the Toronto PDML meet, was Re: Why I love
PDML, was Re: Silly Photo.net thread
> On Sunday, March 10, 2002, at 12:35 PM, frank theriault
wrote:
> >
> > BTW, when are ya gon
Chris asks:
>>> Who cares what you like? You're stupid and LaserDiscs suck.
Welcome to alt.video.laserdisc, circa 1998.
Tom says:
>> Needs a haircut too.
Very true, as the folks who showed up to the Toronto PDML meet can
confirm. Hopefully if the rest of furniture moving goes well tonight
> PDML isn't like that. That's why I like it.
Why do I like it?
PDML = Post any Damn Message you Like
:-)
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 9 March 2002 7:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Why I love PDML, was Re: Si
I like you too, Aaron . You are right. Of all the lists I have checked
out on the web, PDML has the best sense of community. We may not all agree,
but we do respect one another.
The list has been a great help as I recover my health and move away from the
acute depression that resulted from the il
I like the fact than when a question or comment
is asked/made,actual users of the product
contribute.We may receive a dozen different
answers but it sure helps in mind making up
Dave
Begin Original Message
From: Aaron Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PDML isn't like that. That's why
On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
> can't count how many times I've seen questions like "How good is the
> transfer on the LaserDisc of Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid?"
> answered with "Who cares, that movie was stupid and LaserDiscs suck"
> elsewhere on the internet. PDML isn't like
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
>I dropped in to photo.net to contribute some help, as someone had asked
>if anyone had info on the new 75mm f2.8 AL for 67 from Pentax, and the
>first response (from a moderator) was about how there wasn't any good
>reason to make that lens. What about the significantly
7 matches
Mail list logo
