--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I believe the reason that the recent Kodak 25 speed emulsions
> were discontinued was they were able to make signifigant improvements
> in the 100 emulsions to the point that the 25 was obsolete and they
> were unable to make the corresponding impr
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 8 Feb 2005 at 20:11, mike wilson wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the joy
of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other similar
emulsions.
But Shel, you haven't been paying attention
On 8 Feb 2005 at 20:11, mike wilson wrote:
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
> > joy
> > of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
> > similar
> > emulsions.
>
> But Shel, you haven't been paying
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
But Shel, you haven't been paying attention this last few years. All
those "effects" can be "emulated" in
nkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:10 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Yummy Ektar 25
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know
the joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and
other similar emulsions.
Shel
the"bright sun 100" film is the Gold 100 emulsion. Not the same as
Royal Gold/Supra 100, which were ostensibly replaced by Royal Supra
200.
Having shot all three films, the RS200 may be a technically better
film in terms of resolution, but it renders colors differently, and
has quite a bit more co
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
> I think the current film "Bright Sun" (100, damn tacky name).
> is most likely as good as any 100 they ever made and probably
> matches those old 25s too.
No, it doesn't
Bill
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:10:22AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote..
> It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
> joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
> similar emulsions.
Go and buy some Efke 25 or Efke 50. They are *neat*...
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
Shel
That's what I'm feeling, as a newbie photographer. Started photographing
a bit more seriously ab
I think the reason is in great part because of the huge prevalence of
slow-speed zoom lenses that practically required faster film. Had Kodak
wanted to improve slower speed emulsions they could have. The money,
however, was elsewhere.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: J. C. O'Connell
>
> I
The great photographers of the past who haven't had a chance to use
contemporary emulsions are dead. They won't miss the new emulsions.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: J. C. O'Connell
> Its also a shame that the great photographer of the past generations
> never got a chance to use the gre
al Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 10:10 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Yummy Ektar 25
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know
the joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 8:05 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Yummy Ektar 25
I haven't been photographing long enough to mourn those two, but I am
still mourning the passing of Supra/Royal Gold 100. Very nice film,
that... Anybody still got a few
It's a shame that a whole generation of photographers will never know the
joy of emulsions like Ektar 25, Panatomic-X, RG25, Agfa APX-25, and other
similar emulsions.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Mat Maessen
> I haven't been photographing long enough to mourn those two, but I am
> sti
And guess what I found in the fridge a few weeks ago: that roll of RG25
you gave me at Sears Point a couple of years back ;-))
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
>
> Royal Gold 25 was another pretty nice Kodak emulsion, too.
> Some claimed it was the consumer version of the Pro Ekt
I haven't been photographing long enough to mourn those two, but I am
still mourning the passing of Supra/Royal Gold 100. Very nice film,
that...
Anybody still got a few rolls in the fridge? :-)
-Mat
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 03:28:08 -0500 (EST), John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Royal Gold
Royal Gold 25 was another pretty nice Kodak emulsion, too.
Some claimed it was the consumer version of the Pro Ektar 25.
It's been discontinued for around five years, though.
Guess what I'm planning to put in my MZ-S for our field trip :-)
Bruce Dayton mused:
>
> That has got to be one of the s
That has got to be one of the saddest things about the film issue -
discontinuing such great films like that. Almost like Kodak wanted to
dig an early grave.
Bruce
Monday, February 7, 2005, 11:35:13 PM, you wrote:
SB> Dug out some old negs t'nite and found a few rolls that had been shot using
18 matches
Mail list logo
