l Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: istD bit depth
Hi John ...
Couldn't forget that linear stuff since I never knew it
Don't really understand the 2D thing. Are there two rows of pixels,
Sunday, October 24, 2004, 1:46:54 AM, Graywolf wrote:
G> It is at least partially a matter of pixel size. A larger pixel is more
G> sensitive to light, so can see deeper into the shadows. So with 16 bits you have
G> those couple of extra stops of range on the shadow end of the scale. I would
Nice
Rob Studdert mused:
>
> On 23 Oct 2004 at 15:07, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> > Hasselblad says the 22 Mpixels sensor is 37x49mm, which, if my math is
> > correct, is slightly larger than two 35mm frames. In addition they say,
> > "Thanks to its unique Double Duration Circuit technology (patent pen
I was referring to the amplitude resolution, distict levels of gray
of between absolute black and pure white.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD bit depth
Um...
Are you sure
On 23 Oct 2004 at 15:07, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Hasselblad says the 22 Mpixels sensor is 37x49mm, which, if my math is
> correct, is slightly larger than two 35mm frames. In addition they say,
> "Thanks to its unique Double Duration Circuit technology (patent pending),
> the H1D runs more than t
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10/23/2004 12:42:22 PM
Subject: Re: istD bit depth
Shel Belinkoff mused:
The istD has a bit depth of 12. I seem to recall some DSLR with a bit
depth of 14 ... maybe. The specs on the new Hassel
age -
> >From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:23 PM
> >Subject: RE: istD bit depth
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>while the scanners may output a 16bit si
Hasselblad says the 22 Mpixels sensor is 37x49mm, which, if my math is
correct, is slightly larger than two 35mm frames. In addition they say,
"Thanks to its unique Double Duration Circuit technology (patent pending),
the H1D runs more than twice as cool as similar digital camera systems, for
clea
16-bit sensor, and some DSLR cameras 14-bit? Is it a matter of space
(which is what I'm inferring from your remarks)? I heard talk of a
Nikon
D3 with a 16-bit sensor, BTW ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10/23/2004
lad can have a
> 16-bit sensor, and some DSLR cameras 14-bit? Is it a matter of space
> (which is what I'm inferring from your remarks)? I heard talk of a Nikon
> D3 with a 16-bit sensor, BTW ...
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: John Fr
didn't know that...
Resolution of color space,
-Ryan
bewildered,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:23 PM
Subject: RE: istD bit depth
while the scanner
know that...
bewildered,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:23 PM
Subject: RE: istD bit depth
> while the scanners may output a 16bit signal that doesn
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: istD bit depth
Shel,
I think what John is saying is that it takes significantly more power to
compute the four extra bits per pixel between 12 and 16. You'd need much
stronger number-crunching logic around the chip, and more RAM as well,
to make processing of the
ROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: istD bit depth
> Hi John ...
>
> Couldn't forget that linear stuff since I never knew it
>
> Don't really understand the 2D thing. Are there two rows of pixels,
one
> below the other? Nah, that can
r of space
(which is what I'm inferring from your remarks)? I heard talk of a Nikon
D3 with a 16-bit sensor, BTW ...
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 10/23/2004 12:42:22 PM
> Subject: Re: istD b
Shel Belinkoff mused:
>
> The istD has a bit depth of 12. I seem to recall some DSLR with a bit
> depth of 14 ... maybe. The specs on the new Hasselblad claim a bit depth
> of 16. Why is it that so many DSLR cameras are using a bit depth of 12?
> Is there a physical or design reason? Cost? M
16 matches
Mail list logo