Message -
From: "Brian Walters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 7:21 PM
Subject: Re: PESO BW Butterfly
>I quite like the high key background with this although the butterfly
> does seem a little blown out in
On 17/9/08, Christine Aguila, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi Everyone:
>At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
>K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6. I did clone out some ugly piping at
>the bottom. (maybe I should duck now to get out of firing range of the
>anti-photoshoppe
I'm surprised no one has commented on the apparent circle surrounding
the b'fly. Looks like at one point a circular area was chosen to keep,
and the rest dropped off, leaving a difference in whites. It might be
improved if the magic lasso was used to frame just the b'fly, and the
rest dropp
Looks like a good specimen & you've got it all in focus,
but I don't really care for the B+W presentation.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO BW Butterfly
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Christine Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
> K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6. I did clone out some ugly piping at
> the bottom. (maybe I should duck now to get out of firing range o
From: Christine Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
> K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6. I did clone out
> some ugly piping at
> the bottom. (maybe I should duck now to get out of firing
> range of the
> anti-photoshop
The B&W treatment gives it a very different look. Makes you look at
the pattern a bit more. There seems to be some kind of bar or
something near the bottom that doesn't make sense - it just sticks
out a bit from the butterfly. I think I would clone that out. Also
it seems odd the butterfly is c
As Brian said, i like the blown out back ground aswell. Really brings
out the butterfly.
Dave
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Christine Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
> K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6. I did c
Christine Aguila wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
> K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6. I did clone out some ugly piping at
> the bottom. (maybe I should duck now to get out of firing range of the
> anti-photoshoppery folks :-))
>
> small
> ht
Nice Christine, but shouldn't you give us color?
(It's a great place to go shooting!)
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Christine Aguila
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
> At a butterfly haven @ a nature museum here in Chicago.
>
> K10D, 50mm 1.4, ISO 200, 40 sec @ f5.6.
Like it, Christine. You might consider getting rid of the remnant perch,
checkered area in upper left and vertical dashed lines in upper right.
The resulting cleaner look might even improve it's stark tone.
Jack
--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Christine Aguila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Christine
I quite like the high key background with this although the butterfly
does seem a little blown out in places (eg. the feelers). I wouldn't
mind seeing this one in colour.
No objections to photoshoppery of this nature, although the bit of pipe
on the right of the insect sort of gives the game away
12 matches
Mail list logo
