I've submitted something like 20 in total and had 14 accepted into the gallery.
I suspect that given the overwhelming response they're getting more
selective. I doubt mine would have made it in if it weren't for the
fact that I submitted mine early.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/18/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PRO
Cotty wrote:
>On 18/2/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>or were you kidding...?
>>
>>
>
>Your kidding me now, right Ann ?
>
>
>
I dont know anymore :)
ann
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/16/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/2/07, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
> >require great photography.
>
> Failing miserably on these two criteria alone, I can boast a third (and
> f
Ann isn't kidding. Like other good photographers, she doesn't give a
crap about equipment threads:-).
Paul
On Feb 18, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Cotty wrote:
> On 18/2/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> or were you kidding...?
>
> Your kidding me now, right Ann ?
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
>
On 18/2/07, ann sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
>or were you kidding...?
Your kidding me now, right Ann ?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Ann, you haven't been paying attention., Cotty, surgically alters these
poor defenseless Pentax lenses so that they can mate in an unholy union
with his Canon Monstrosity.
Oh yes, he uses the A*85mm f1.4 and the [K] 15mm f3.5.
ann sanfedele wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
>
>> On 15/2/07, Carlson,
ann sanfedele wrote:
> Cotty wrote:
>
>> On 15/2/07, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO, discombobulated, unleashed:
>>
>>
>>
>>> No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
>>> require great photography.
>>>
>>>
>> Failing miserably on these two criteria alone, I can boas
Cotty wrote:
>On 15/2/07, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>
>>No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
>>require great photography.
>>
>>
>
>Failing miserably on these two criteria alone, I can boast a third (and
>fatal) blow: I use P
Thanks, but I meant the new Pentax gallery...J
At 03:20 PM 2/17/07, you wrote:
>The upload page is down use this
>
>http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html
>
>J wrote:
> > Ok guys where do you upload the photos for the gallery ? Thnaks J
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>--
>--
>
>The more I know of men, the mo
The upload page is down use this
http://pug.komkon.org/general/submit.html
J wrote:
> Ok guys where do you upload the photos for the gallery ? Thnaks J
>
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
PDML Pentax-Dis
On Feb 17, 2007, at 12:21 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> I uploaded some pics a couple of weeks ago. I was able to upload both
> those with EXIF data and those without. The latter were uploaded with
> the box checked next to "this is a scanned image." Note that they have
> to be AT LEAST 600 pixels t
On 15/2/07, Carlson, John___PAIC_SO, discombobulated, unleashed:
>No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
>require great photography.
Failing miserably on these two criteria alone, I can boast a third (and
fatal) blow: I use Pentax lenses on Canon digital. I dare
Doug Brewer wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
>> John, I think I may have an image or two to add to the gallery.
>>
>> How do I get enrolled?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
> I'm not John, but I'd probably go by what he said:
My bad, having replied to the wrong message.
I've alrea
On 2/16/07, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> > John, I think I may have an image or two to add to the gallery.
> >
> > How do I get enrolled?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I'm not John, but I'd probably go by what he said:
Your name's not Joh
John, I think I may have an image or two to add to the gallery.
How do I get enrolled?
Thanks.
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
> I am not sure many of you are aware of the PENTAX Photo Annuals which
> include a great collection of PENTAX images. These annuals only come
> out once a year. PENTAX
I uploaded some pics a couple of weeks ago. I was able to upload both
those with EXIF data and those without. The latter were uploaded with
the box checked next to "this is a scanned image." Note that they have
to be AT LEAST 600 pixels tall. That's true of both horizontal and
vertical shots. A
Well, that certainly leaves me out.
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
> No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
> require great photography.
>
>
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise Germaine de Stael
--
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:31:00PM +1300, David Mann wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Tom C wrote:
>
> > Applied. you?
>
> I received the invitation in my email a while back. Eventually
> decided it wasn't a scam and registered, but got errors when trying
> to upload an initial set of
On Feb 16, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Tom C wrote:
> Applied. you?
I received the invitation in my email a while back. Eventually
decided it wasn't a scam and registered, but got errors when trying
to upload an initial set of photos.
I must get around to trying the upload again. I'm mostly frustra
On Feb 16, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> John, I think I may have an image or two to add to the gallery.
>
> How do I get enrolled?
>
> Thanks.
I'm not John, but I'd probably go by what he said:
>>
>> If you are interested in applying and submitting images, please
>> send a
>> re
t: Re: PENTAX Photo Gallery
Now I'm doubly screwed...
Norm
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
> No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
> require great photography.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
Now I'm doubly screwed...
Norm
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
> No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
> require great photography.
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO"
Subject: PENTAX Photo Gallery
> No worries, the gallery is not just for professionals. However, it does
> require great photography.
Darn.
That pretty much lets me out too.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdm
"It's an exhibition of select, thought-provoking images captured by
specially chosen professional photographers."
Guess that leaves me out...damn professionals.
Norm
Carlson, John___PAIC_SO wrote:
> I am not sure many of you are aware of the PENTAX Photo Annuals which
> include a great collection
Applied. you?
Tom C.
>From: "Carlson, John___PAIC_SO" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To:
>Subject: PENTAX Photo Gallery
>Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:51:51 -0700
>
>I am not sure many of you are aware of the PENTAX Photo Annuals which
>include a great collection of PENTA
301 - 325 of 325 matches
Mail list logo
