http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Tasma&Developer=&mdc=Search
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Svema&Developer=&mdc=Search
http://thedarkroom.com/black-and-white-prints-and-film-developing/
Hope this helps.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:29 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
>
> Hi
Digital truth shall reveal all.
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Tasma&Developer=&mdc=Search&TempUnits=C
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?Film=Svema&Developer=&mdc=Search&TempUnits=C
Constantly updated. It may not take into account the age of the film
but it's a starting
It looks like Darin sent you a couple of the same links that i did. One
thing you might look into is anti fogging agents. Not sure where I'd
look them up, but a good public library "might" still have some books on
the esoterica of darkroom work.
On 7/15/2014 4:29 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
H
You need to get a strip test done on each roll to establish the correct
processing. Pro labs used to do this, but are there any left?
> On 15 Jul 2014, at 21:30, "Igor Roshchin" wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I discovered a few rolls of undeveloped B&W film that are 20-some years
> old that I shot
It looks like A&I still does snip tests:
http://aandi.com/film-processing
A&I was my lab of choice for slide film when I lived in LA. (I did my own B&W.)
Rocky Mountain Film Lab is a name I've heard over the years for
developing old film, but I haven't used them:
http://www.rockymountainfilm.co
There is an app for that. Seriously. I don't have it loaded anymore, but I did
at one point have an iPhone app that had development times etc for huge
varieties of film with many different chemicals. Once I realized how slim the
chances were that I might actually once again develop any film, it
Igor,
In your situation, I'd want a lab where I can talk to the technician &
get a feel for if they're going to give the kind of custom service you
want (i.e. adjust the development time per the instructions on the box +
whatever accommodation they have to make for the film being old). For
me, th
Thanks to everybody who responded with suggestions.
Darren and P.J., - thanks, - I had not known that resource, it's useful.
It looks like the optimum process for both films would be Rodinal.
Stan, - thanks, - but it looks like the information on the pages linked
by Darren and P.J. is sufficient
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:33 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
> I am considering A&I as a candidate. Even though they don't use
> Rodinal, but X-Tol, given the age of the film, I don't think it would
> make a big difference...
Honestly, in your situation, I would prefer Xtol. Rodinal is a very
fine-gra
Matthew,
Thaks for sharing your thoughts.
I don't have a strong preference, but what I saw (after sending the
previous message) is the note on DigitalTruth about Xtol used with Svema
FN64:
http://www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.php?devrow=5012
"User reports poor results with this combination, test
I developed a few rolls of ~20 year old film a while back. I only tried
Rodinal and D-76. Hands down, Rodinal produced much less fog. The old
rolls of Plus-X, developed in Rodinal at standard times plus 10%, looked
as good as new. Tri-X showed some fog. I had one roll of HIE and it it
degraded
11 matches
Mail list logo
