Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, but did you order it from Mike himself or did you order from the
> site he's using to publish it?
I ordered on-line from Lulu.
> Us poor early adopters ordered from Mike before he had ANY of this [...]
I guess we know where the slow link in the c
> > From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > I ordered my copy about three months ago, and got it within a week.
> > Same for "Lenses and the Light-tight Box", which I ordered about a
> > month after that. Both good -- warmly recommended.
Ah, but did you order it from Mike himself or
>
> From: Tom Ivar Helbekkmo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/13 Tue PM 12:58:53 GMT
> To: Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> CC: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Final SMP
>
> Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has everyone got their copy of "The Empirical Photographer"? Has
> *anyone* got their copy of TEP yet??? From the web site it appears he's
> finally shipping in batches but I have still not got mine (ordered, what
> was it, two years ago now) so I wa
Gentlemen, Ladies, calm down.
> I've pretty well given up. AFAIK, I was one of the first orderers, within
> 24hours of it being
> announced. Still not here. Class action, anyone?
I have written few e-mail to Mike and he supplied me with PDF version
of the book. Along with that came promises
>
> From: Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/09/12 Mon AM 08:50:09 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Final SMP
>
>
>
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> > Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SM
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles.
Has everyone got their copy of "The Empirical Photographer"? Has
*anyone* got their copy of TEP yet??? From the web site it appears he's
finally shipping in batches but I have still not got m
It's obvious dpreview is "supported" by Canon - they're one of
the biggest advertisers, IIRC (and they always make sure that
Phil gets the latest Canon models to test, as soon as possible).
But apart from good marketing by Canon, I think most of the
complaints are just sour grapes. Sure, Phil gi
Which might lend some credence to recent reports that Dpreview is somehow
supported by Canon?
Shel
"Am I paranoid or perceptive?"
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> > >>Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
> > >
> > >You won't be seeing anything from him on the d
In a message dated 9/11/2005 5:44:46 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No - he's banned.
I didn't see the posts in question, but reportedly he was warned
by Phil about some negative comments he made about the Canon 5D,
and responded with some gratuitous flameage.
==
Hehe
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:25:14PM -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> No reason given? Perhaps just too much work?
> On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
> >>Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
> >
>
No reason given? Perhaps just too much work?
On Sep 11, 2005, at 3:47 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
You won't be seeing anything from him on the dpreview site, either ..
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 11:30:25AM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
> Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles..
You won't be seeing anything from him on the dpreview site, either ..
On Sep 11, 2005, at 8:30 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles. I've
thoroughly enjoyed them for the last couple years. I think I may have
learned a thing or two from them, I've certainly disagreed with some
of them, and I think my enablement bug ca
Not much of an ending...
Scott Loveless wrote:
Looks like Mikey's calling it quits on the SMP articles. I've
thoroughly enjoyed them for the last couple years. I think I may have
learned a thing or two from them, I've certainly disagreed with some
of them, and I think my enablement bug can be
15 matches
Mail list logo
