> Less glossy papers "wick" the ink out away from the point of
> application. So "throwing" a 0.01mm droplet of ink, it'll hit the
> paper and be wicked out to maybe 0.05mm or 0.1mm (depending on the
> paper, of course). In general, the "matter" the paper, the more
> wicking action it will have.
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:18:35 -0600, Dan Scott wrote:
> On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 06:12 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> >
> > paper, of course). In general, the "matter" the paper, the more
> > wicking action it will have. There's a technical term for this, but I
> > can't recall it at the momen
On Monday, February 3, 2003, at 06:12 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Less glossy papers "wick" the ink out away from the point of
application. So "throwing" a 0.01mm droplet of ink, it'll hit the
paper and be wicked out to maybe 0.05mm or 0.1mm (depending on the
paper, of course). In general, the "
On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 11:45:12 -0500, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > > and the paper certainly matters as we have discussed here.
> >
> > Well, I'm not so sure of that. The printer doesn't know what paper you
> > have in it.
>
> > What it knows is which paper selection you've made in the
> > printer set
CBWaters wrote:
> T
> I also bought a box of Epson heavyweight Matte (forgive me, I like matte
> finish better) today so we'll see if these look better than the Kodak stuff
> I just finished. The glossy stuf is so much mroe expensive anyway. One
> thing I noticed, this Epson paper is one-sided, a
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I also bought a box of Epson heavyweight Matte (forgive me, I like matte
finish better) today so we'll see if these look better than the Kodak stuff
I just finished. The glossy stuf is so much mroe expensive anyway. One
thing I noticed, this Epso
Oh, yes, I believe you're right, Paul. I forgot about that. I'll see if I
can find out what the new name is and get back to the list.
--Mike
> I believe Epson has changed the name of this paper, although I'm not
> quite sure what they're calling it now. Perhaps someone else can provide
> that. I
I believe Epson has changed the name of this paper, although I'm not
quite sure what they're calling it now. Perhaps someone else can provide
that. I know you can find it at inkjetgoodies.com. They're a great
source for ink and paper. You can also get the Hannemuhle Digital Fine
Art paper at that s
Doug Franklin wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Feb 2003 03:12:02 -0500, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
>
> > Well he is using a different printer, Doug. MIght matter.
>
> That's why I mentioned which printer I have. :-)
ann sez
O? :) I mentioned that for the benefit of others,actually, I knew you
knew but
I think it
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT: Epson ink use & printing issues
Dave,
You might want to try Epson Archival Matte. Doesn't look the same as
the
Photo Paper Pro, but the Epson costs roughly the same for 50 sheets
as the
Canon does for 15 sheets. Useful for reducing costs w
On Saturday, February 1, 2003, at 08:25 AM, CBWaters wrote:
I bought a new color cartridge for my Color 740 last weekend. I've
been
printing a lot this week, trying to figure out why all my prints look
washed-out. You may recall I was asking about color management. I've
printed about eight
On the Epson Stylus Photo 750, I get about 25 8x10s from a color cartridge.
I'm not sure about the black cartridge.
Pat White
I'm not sure what the specs of the Epson 740, but your cartridge should
be able to produce more than 8 5x7s. I get about 10 to 15 11 x 14s from
each color cartridge on my Epson 1200. I don't like Kodak inkjet papers.
The best glossy is Epson Premium Photo Paper. Epson Archival Matte is
also very ni
Cory.
This is were the individual tanks come in handy.I get about 48
8x10's from a full head on the Canon S 800.Works out to about 4-4.50
per sheet.(Canadian$)
I found Kodak paper did not work well with this printer,but am happy
with the Canon Photo Paper Pro and Ilfords Classic Gloss and Classi
14 matches
Mail list logo
